JUDGMENT : Y.K. Sabharwal, CJI. This appeal is directed against the order of the Special Court (Trial of Offences relating to Transactions in Securities), Bombay, directing the Custodian, i.e. the first respondent herein, to take up sale of certain items of respondent Nos.3, 5 and 6 before that Court. In this appeal, the challenge to the impugned order is only by the appellant B.C.Dalal (respondent No.5 before the Special Court), the notified person. The learned Special Court has directed the sale of ornaments and jewellery seized from the residential flat of the notified person by the Income Tax Department and made over to the Custodian. 2. The learned Special Court has noted that the appellant has not filed any document which will indicate that these items are not owned by him but his wife, daughters-in-law and sons and that they have also not cared to file any affidavit claiming ownership thereof. 3. We have heard learned counsel and also perused the reply to the applicationthat was filed by the appellant before the Special Court. Apart from what is noted in the impugned order, the reply of the appellant (paragraphs 16 to 24) shows the vague pleas made by the appellant. It was stated therein that the jewellery seized by the Income Tax Department does not wholly belong to the appellant but it was not stated as to which part belonged to him and which part to anybody else. We find no infirmity in the impugned order. 4. In this view, the civil appeal is dismissed.