Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 40 (PAT)

Most. Uttam Raj Kuer v. State Of Bihar

2006-01-10

NARAYAN ROY

body2006
Judgment Narayan Roy, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This writ application arises out of the order passed by the authorities under the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, 1956 (hereinafter to be referred to as "Act").. 3. It does not appear to be a case that pursuant to the order passed by the authorities under the Act, the petitioners have been dispossessed or any right has been created in favour of respondent no. 5. The proceeding under the Act has already been denotified. 4. In that view of the matter, the order passed by the authorities under the Act would not affect the right, title and interest of the petitioners, unless a contrary decision is rendered by the competent civil court in any suit filed by either of the parties. 5. With the direction/observation aforesaid, this application is disposed of.