Research › Search › Judgment

Uttarakhand High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 419 (UTT)

Satya Prasad v. New India Assurance Co.

2006-08-04

J.C.S.RAWAT, R.GUPTA

body2006
JUDGMENT Rajeev Gupta, C.J. 1. This is claimant's appeal for enhancement of the compensation awarded by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/District Judge, Dehradun vide Award dated 2.8.2003 passed in M.A.C.T. No. 153 of 1998. 2. Appellant/claimant Satya Prasad Pant claimed compensation of Rs. 3,74,000 for the injuries suffered by him in the motor accident on 18.4.1998 when his bus bearing registration No. UP 07-G-9621 was hit by a private bus bearing registration No. UP02-C-6143 resulting in multiple serious injuries to the claimant. The claimant further pleaded that, on account of the injuries and the fractures sustained by him in the accident, he was rendered unfit to pursue his occupation as Bus Driver in U.P. Road Transport Corporation. 3. The owner, driver and the insurer of the private bus bearing registration No. UP 02-C-6143 contested the claim and pleaded that the accident took place on account of the negligence of the claimant, himself. 4. The Tribunal, on the evidence led by the parties, held that claimant Satya Prasad Pant sustained injuries in the motor accident on 18.4.1998 and the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent act of the drivers of both the buses. 5. Considering the nature of the injuries suffered by the claimant and the evidence led in regard to the amount spent on treatment, the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 27,000 towards Medical Expenses and a sum of Rs. 10,000 towards physical Pain and mental agony. Thus, the total compensation was assessed at Rs 37,000. As the Tribunal found the drivers of both the buses equally responsible for the accident and the claimant, himself, was the driver of one of the two buses, he was found entitled to receive 50% of the above amount of compensation of Rs. 37,000 as compensation. The Tribunal, therefore, directed the insurer of the private bus bearing registration No. UP02-C-6143 to pay compensation of Rs. 18,500 along with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition to the claimant. 6. Mr. L.K. Tewari, the learned Counsel for the appellant vehemently argued that the Tribunal has erred in holding that the appellant also equally contributed to the accident, in assessing low compensation of Rs. 37,000 only and in not awarding any amount towards future treatment. 7. 6. Mr. L.K. Tewari, the learned Counsel for the appellant vehemently argued that the Tribunal has erred in holding that the appellant also equally contributed to the accident, in assessing low compensation of Rs. 37,000 only and in not awarding any amount towards future treatment. 7. The fact that appellant Satya Prasad Pant sustained injuries in the motor accident on 18.4.1998 was not seriously disputed by the owner, driver and insurer of the private bus bearing registration No. UP 02-C-6143 before the Tribunal That apart, the finding recorded by the Tribunal in that behalf has, now, attained finality, as none of the respondents have filed any appeal against the award. 8. From the evidence available on record, it is established that the appellant suffered multiple fractures in his right leg in the accident. For the treatment of those fractures, his leg was operated upon twice. It has, further, come in his evidence that the appellant had to remain hospitalised for a period of one month. During the period of his hospitalisation and even thereafter, the appellant must have suffered physical pain and mental agony on account of the injuries and the fractures sustained by him in the accident. True, it has come in the evidence of the claimant, himself, that even after the accident he is continuing to receive the same salary from U.P. Road Transport Corporation as he was receiving before the accident. The compensation of Rs. 37,000 assessed by the Tribunal, when examined in the context of the above mentioned broad features of the case, is certainly on the lower side and deserves to be enhanced suitably. 9. In our considered view, a lump sum of Rs. 50,000 towards the medical expenses and pain and suffering would be just and proper compensation in the case and would meet the ends of justice. 10. As we do not find any material to disagree with the finding recorded by the Tribunal that the appellant, himself, also equally contributed to the accident, the appellant would be entitled to receive only 50% of the above amount of compensation of Rs. 50,000 i.e. Rs. 25,000 only. 11. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal filed by the appellant under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is allowed in part. The compensation of Rs. 18,500 awarded by the Tribunal is enhanced to Rs. 25,000. 50,000 i.e. Rs. 25,000 only. 11. For the foregoing reasons, the appeal filed by the appellant under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act for enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is allowed in part. The compensation of Rs. 18,500 awarded by the Tribunal is enhanced to Rs. 25,000. The enhanced amount of compensation shall carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the application. 12. No order as to costs.