Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 468 (PAT)

Rajeev Ranjan @ Rajeev, Ranjan Priyadarshi v. State Of Bihar

2006-05-16

J.N.BHATT

body2006
Judgment 1. This is an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, "the Code"), by which the petitioners have made a prayer for quashing the First Information Report of Budha Colony RS. Case No. 137 of 2003 registered under Sections 498A, 323/34 of the indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 2. In this petition the petitioner no. 1 Rajeev Ranjan @ Rajeev Ranjan Priyadarshi is the husband of the informant and so far this petitioner is concerned, it cannot be said that the complaint does not disclose any offence or the charges under Sec. 498A of the Indian Penal Code against him. 3. However, the only contention, which is advanced, is with regard to quashing the criminal proceedings against the petitioner no. 2, the mother-in-law of the informant. It is submitted that there is no any averment or allegation which could disclose any offences against the petitioner no.2. This submission is, also, not countenanced by the learned Counsel appearing for the State. 4. Whatever the statement is made in the F.I.R. against the petitioner no.2 the mother-in-law, does not at all constitute any offence. In this set of circumstances, this is a fit and appropriate case to exercise the inherent power of this Court interfering and quashing the criminal proceedings against the petitioner no.2, the mother-in-law of the informant. 5. So far the petitioner no. 1, the husband, is concerned, there is a prima facie case and offence is disclosed against him. Hence, his prayer for quashing the criminal proceeding shall stand rejected. 6. In the result, the present application in so far as petitioner no. 1, the husband, is concerned, shall stand dismissed and in so far as the petitioner no. 2 Pushpalata Devi, the mother-in-law of the informant, is concerned shall stand allowed.