Research › Search › Judgment

Punjab High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 497 (PNJ)

Ajit Singh v. State

2006-02-16

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

body2006
Judgment ADARSH KUMAR GOEL, J. 1. Heard. As prayed for, section 326 IPC is allowed to be added in the heading of the petition and the prayer. Offence alleged is under sections 379/323/324/355/506/341/ 326/148/149 IPC. 2. Case of the prosecution is that on 23.1.2006 at 11.30 A. M. , the petitioners assaulted the complainant. There was rivalry on account of party faction with the truck union. Injury attributed to Avtar Singh has been declared to be grievous. 3. Counsel for the petitioners submits that Avtar Singh is not seeking anticipatory bail and injuries attributed to the petitioners are simple; they are willing to join investigation and cooperate with the investigation and their arrest at this stage is not called for. 4. Without expressing any final opinion on merits, the petitioners are granted anticipatory bail till conclusion of investigation or three months whichever is later during which the petitioners will be free to apply for regular bail to the concerned court in accordance with law. 5. In the event of arrest, the petitioners will be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the arresting officer within two weeks from today on the conditions that the petitioners will not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; they will not interfere with the prosecution evidence directly or indirectly; they will not leave the country without the previous permission of the court; they will associate with the investigation as and when called by the police and that they will surrender the passport, if any. The petition is disposed of accordingly.