eh.kk] lnL;-&;g f}rh; vihy jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 dh /kkjk 224 ds rgr jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] lhdj }kjk vihy la[;k 92@2003 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 25-5-2004 ds fo:) izLrqr dh gSA 2- izdj.k ds laf{kIr esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd oknh@izR;FkhZx.k us izfroknh@ vihykFkhZ ds fo:) v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa ?kks"k.kk] LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk o bUnzkt nq:Lrh dk okn izLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k fd xzke lqjsjk esa fLFkr Hkwfe [kljk uEcj 243 jdck 02 ch?kk 01 fcLok ij igys oknh la[;k 1 ds firk dkfct dkr Fks rFkk muds ipkr~ oknh dkfct dkr gSA fxjnkojh ls bldh iqf"V gksrh gSA lgou ls jktLo fjdkMZ izfroknh us uke pyk vk jgk gSaA oknh ds firk us 2018 esa ,d fy[kkoV ls ;g Hkwfe fnukad 2-7-61 dks Ø; dj yh FkhA vr% ;g okn Lohdkj dj oknh izR;FkhZx.k dks [kkrsnkj dkrdkj ?kksf"kr fd;k tkdj jktLo fjdkMZ nq:Lr fd;k tkosA izfroknh vihykFkhZ us tokcnkok izLrqr dj okn ds dFkuksa dks vLohdkj djrs gq, okn [kkfjt djus dk fuosnu fd;kA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; mi[k.M vf/kdkjh nkrkjkex<+ }kjk i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds mijkUr vius fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 28-7-2003 ls oknh izR;FkhZx.k dk okn fMØh dj fn;kA bl fu.kZ; ls vizlUu gksdj vihykFkhZ }kjk jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] lhdj ds U;k;ky; esa vihy izLrqr dh ftls mUgksaus vius fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 25-5-2004 ds }kjk [kkfjt dj nhA bl fu.kZ; ls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZ }kjk ;g f}rh; vihy jktLo e.My esa izLrqr dh x;h gSA 3- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa dh cgl lquhA 4- fo}ku vf/koDrk vihyk.V us viuh cgl esa dFku fd;k fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us izfrdwy dCts ds vk/kkj ij nkok fMØh fd;k gS tcfd ijh{k.k U;k;ky; esa okn i= dh IyhfMaXl esa izfrdwy dCts dh dksbZ Hkh Li"V Iyh ugha yh x;h gSA ijh{k.k U;k;ky; us ikap rudh dk;e dh Fkh ftlesa igyh rhu rudh;k oknh dks lkfcr djuh Fkh vkSj pkSFkh rudh tks fd cSpku ds ckjs esa Fkh vkSj ftldk Hkkj izfroknh ij Fkk ftlesa izfroknh dks ;g fl) djuk Fkk fd fnukad 2-7-61 dks dksbZ fy[kkoV cSpku lEcU/kh ugha dh gSA bl rudh dks U;k;ky; us vkafkd :i ls izfroknh ds i{k esa r; fd;k gS ijUrq ;g dgh Hkh Li"V ugha fd;k gS fd bl rudh dks izfroknh ds i{k esa vkafkd :i ls r; fd;s tkus dk vFkZ D;k gS\ ih-MCY;w-1 oknh us ;g Lohdkj fd;k gS fd tehu dk mls cSpku fd;k x;k gS vkSj og frtkjk vFkok cVkbZ ij ugha gSA ,Dth-3&, iath—r cspku i= ds ckjs esa gS ftls fdlh Hkh vVsfLVax xokg }kjk fl) ugha djk;k x;k gSA viath—r nLrkost ds vk/kkj ij fdlh Hkh izdkj ds vf/kdkj izkIr ugha gks ldrs tSlk fd 1991 vkjvkjlh ist 133 esa dgk x;k gS vkSj ftlesa 1975 vkjvkjMh ist 305 ,oa 1989 vkjvkjMh ist 750 izfrikfnr fl)kUr dk ikyu fd;k x;k gSA blh izdkj 1997 vkjvkjMh ist 429 ¼Mh-ch- jktLo e.My½ Hkh fjysosUV gS ftlds vuqlkj [kkrsnkjh dsoy /kkjk 5 vFkok /kkjk 19 ds vk/kkj ij gh nh tk ldrh gSA 2004 vkjvkjMh ist 173 ¼Mh-ch- jktLo e.My½ iSjk 13 o 15 bl izdj.k esa iw.kZr;k% ykxw gksrk gS vkSj blesa 1995 vkjchts lqfize dksVZ ist 5 esa nh x;h O;oLFkk dk vuqlj.k fd;k x;k gSA 5- fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZx.k us vius tokc esa bl ckr ij tksj fn;k fd og cSpku ds vk/kkj ij lgefr ls yEcs le; ls dkfct gSA Mh-MCY;w- 1 vkSj Mh-MCY;w-2 esa ckaVs ij dkr fd;k tkuk vafdr crk;k gS vkSj ;g Hkh dgk fd /kkjk 63 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e ds vuqlkj [kkrsnkjh ,DlVsfUol gks pqdh gSA 2001 vkjvkjMh ist 184 vksj 1991 vkjvkjMh ist 1 ds vuqlkj yxkrkj dCts ds vk/kkj ij [kkrsnkjh nh tk ldrh gSA ,vkbZvkj 1994 lqfize dksVZ ist 1128 dk Hkh m)j.k fn;k x;kA csap }kjk ;g izu iwNk x;k fd 1995 vkjchts lqfize dksVZ ist 5 ds vuqlkj VkbZVy vkSj eq[kkyQkuk dCts dh Iyh ,d nwljs ds fojks/kkHkk"kh ekuh x;h gS vki blesa ls fdl Iyh ij tksj ns jgs gS blds tokc esa vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ }kjk ;g dgk x;k fd vihykFkhZ }kjk cSpku ds vk/kkj ij lgefr ls dCtk NksMk x;k gS ,oa yEcs le; ls dCts ds vk/kkj ij muds eq[kkyQkuk dCtk curk gSA 6- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa dh cgl ij euu fd;k i=koyh ,oa miyC/k fjdkMZ dk v/;;u o voyksdu fd;k rFkk izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa ij euu fd;kA 7- ;g Li"Vr;k% bl izdkj dk izdj.k gS ftlesa nksuksa gh v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa dks eq[kkyQkuk dCts ds fl)kUr esa lEHkor% dksbZ Hkh Kku ugha gSa rudh la[;k 1 ls 3 dks fuf.kZr djrs gq, flQZ dCts ds vk/kkj ij [kkrsnkjh dh ?kks"k.kk dj nh x;h gS tcfd [kkrsnkjh esa vkjEHk ls gh izR;FkhZ dk uke pyk vk jgk gSA eq[kkyQkuk dCts ds fy, ;g fl) djuk vko;d gS fd dCtk lgefr ls ugha gksdj fojks/kiwoZd Hostile possession dk gS tSls fd U;kf;d fl)kUr Hkwjk eksfx;k cuke lrhk ixfj;k ¼2001½ 9 ,llhlh ist 385 esa izfrikfnr ;g fd;k x;k gS tgka lgefr ls vk/kkj ij dCtk gS ogka eq[kyQkuk dCts dk izu gh ugha mBrk gSA 8- vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ us ckj ckj iqNs tkus ij Hkh dCtk lgefr ds vk/kkj ij gksus dh ckr dgha gSA ,sls esa eq[kkyQkuk dCts dk vfHkdFku fdlh Hkh izdkj ls iks"k.kh; ugha gSA lkFk gh 2004 vkjvkjMh ist 173 esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr Hhk bl izdj.k esa iw.kZr;k% ykxw gksrk gSA 1995 vkjchts lqfize dksVZ ist 5 esa bl izdkj O;oLFkk nh x;h gS %& "Limitation Act, 1963 — Article 64 and 65 — Adverse possession when the plea of adverse possession cannot be raised. The plea based on the title and adverse possession are mutually inconsistent and the later does not begin to operate until the former is renounced. It is his own case that the came into possession of the suit house in his own right and remained in possession as an owner. The appellant is only benamindar. Therefore, his plea is based on his own title. He never renounced his character as an owner, asserting adverse possession openly to the knowledge of the appellant without acknowledging/or acquiescing the right, the title and interest of the appellant. The plea of adverse possession, through available to the respondent, was never raised by him. Only on receipt of the first notice he denied title of the appellant and made it known to him for the firs ttime through the reply notice got issued by him. Even then the plea of adverse possession was not raised in thewritten statement. No explanation for the belated plea was given. Even assuming that the reply stated March 15, 1971 constitutes assertion of adverse possession, thelimitation would start running against the appellant only from March 15, 1971 and not earlier. The suit was filed in 1978 within 12 years. Under these circumstances, the High court is not justified in permitting the respondent to raise the plea of adverse possession." 2000 MCY;w-,y-lh- ¼,l-lh-½ ist 240 esa eq[kkyQkuk dCts ds lEcU/k esa fuEu O;oLFkk nh x;h gS %& "Transfer of Property act, 1882, S. 53-A — Scope — Plea of Adverse Possession and retaining possession by operation of Section are inconsistent with each other — Once it is admitted even by implication that plaintiff came into possession of land lawfully under an Agreement and continued to remain in possession till date of suit, plea of adverse possession would not be available to defendant unless defendatn asserts and points hostile animus of retaining possession as owner after getting in possession of land. As the suit was filed on 4.2.1969, it cannot be said that defendant has perfected his title by adverse possession. In the written statement, the defendant has only asserted that about 14 years ago plaintiff gave this land by executing the sale agreement for Rs.611/- the sale-deed was written in presence of two persons of the same village and hence since 1955 defendant is in possession of the land as an owner/purchaser. In the written statement, the defendant has only asserted that about 14 years ago plaintiff gave this land by executing the sale agreement for Rs.611/- the sale-deed was written in presence of two persons of the same village and hence since 1955 defendant is in possession of the land as an owner/purchaser. Therefore, he has become owner of the suit property by adverse possession. Except this bare evidence, there is no other evidence on record to establish that the defendant got possession of the property by purchasing the same. As against this, the revenue record clearly establishes that plaintiff was theowner of the defendant for cultivation as bataidar. It apears that the High Court materially erred in not referring to the evidence of palintiff who has specifically deposed that in the year 1956-57 he had given the suit land to adverse possession and retaining the possession by operation of ection 53-A of the Transfer of property Act are inconsistent with each other. Once it is admitted by implication that plaintiff came into possession of the land lawfully under the agreement and continued to remain in possession tillthe date of the suit, the plea of adverse possession would not be available to the defendant unless it has been asserted and pointed out hostile animus of retaining possession as an owner after getting in possession of the land." 10- fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ }kjk m)fjr 2001 vkjvkjMh ist 184 esa tks og ljdkjh Hkwfe ij dCts ds lEcU/k esa vkSj bl izdj.k esa ykxw ugha ekuk tk ldrkA ,vkbZvkj 1994 lqfize dksVZ 1128 dksyksukbZtsku ,DV ds vUrxZr Hkwfe ds vkoaVu ds lEcU/k esa gS tks eq[kkyQkuk dCts ds izdj.k esa ykxw ugha ekuk tk ldrkA viath—r cSpku i= dk dkuwu esa dksbZ izHkko ugha gS vkSj lkFk gh ;g viath—r foØ; i= fjdkMZ ds vk/kkj ij nks vVsfLVax xokg }kjk fl) Hkh ugha djk;k x;k gSA vr% cSpku fl) ugha ekuk tk ldrkA 11- ,slh nkk esa dkuwu dh eakk Li"V gS fd cSpku fjdkMZ ds vk/kkj ij fl) ugha gS ,oa dCtk eq[kkyQkuk Hkh fl) ugha gS vr% vihy Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA 12- mijksDr foospuk ds vk/kkj ij f}rh; vihy Lohdkj dh tkrh gS ,oa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; o fMØh Øek% fnukad 25-5-2005 ,oa 28-7-2003 fujLr fd;s tkrs gSA 13- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA