Research › Search › Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 561 (MP)

Ram Kumar v. State of Haryana

2006-04-19

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, D.K.JAIN

body2006
ORDER 1. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 19.8.2004 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Criminal Appeal No. 146-SB of 1992 whereby the High Court has maintained the conviction and sentence passed against the appellant herein by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jind vide judgment and order dated 6.3.1992. We have heard Mr D.K. Garg, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Rajeev Gaur 'Naseem', learned counsel for the State and perused the judgment impugned in this appeal and the evidence tendered in this case. According to the prosecution, on 9.3.1991, the prosecutrix Bimla was abducted by the appellant Ram Kumar and she was subjected to sexual intercourse by him. On 17.3.1991, an FIR under sections 366 and 376 of the Penal Code was registered at the instance of the father of the girl, namely, Shri Sher Singh. On 29.3.1991, the girl was recovered and as per the statement made by Smt. Roshini (PW 7), the mother, she was brought by the police from village Sirsawa on 29.3.1991 and on that date the police got the statement of the girl recorded in the Court of SDJM, Safidon under section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code. On 30.3.1991 the case was committed to the Court of Sessions. The prosecution examined as many as eight witnesses. The learned Additional Sessions Judge by order dated 6.3.1992 convicted the appellant under sections 366 and 376 of the Penal Code and sentenced him as under: "Hence I hereby convict the accused under section 376, IPC and sentence him to the minimum sentence of RI for seven years and a fine of Rs. 250 (two hundred and fifty only), in default of payment of fine the accused shall undergo further RI for four months and I further convict the accused under section 366, IPC and sentence him to RI for five years and a fine of Rs. 150 (One hundred and fifty only) and in default of payment of fine the accused shall undergo RI for three months." 2. On appeal, the High Court by judgment and order dated 19.8.2004 confirmed the conviction and sentence of the appellant and passed the order as under : "I have also examined the question whether taking into consideration the age of the appellant any further reduction in the sentence can be made. On appeal, the High Court by judgment and order dated 19.8.2004 confirmed the conviction and sentence of the appellant and passed the order as under : "I have also examined the question whether taking into consideration the age of the appellant any further reduction in the sentence can be made. In view of the circumstances referred to hereinabove, I do not find it to be a fit case to warrant such a reduction." 3. The appellant, aggrieved by the order passed by the High Court has filed the above appeal by way of appeal. We have been taken through the statement and evidence recorded by the Court. Our attention was also drawn to the judgment passed by both the Sessions Court as well as the judgment passed by the High Court. The learned counsel for the appellant drew our attention to the statement of the girl Bimla (PW 5) and also drew our attention to the evidence of the doctor. We have carefully analysed the evidence tendered by the prosecution. In our opinion, sufficient evidence was tendered by the prosecution to prove the guilt of the accused. However, at the time of hearing it is brought to our notice that the girl has now got married and living with her husband. The said statement is also ratified by the evidence of the father of the girl. Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that the sentence imposed by the Sessions Court and as affirmed by the High Court under section 366 and 376 of the Penal Code is on the highside. In our opinion, ends of justice would be amply met if we reduce the sentence to three years. We do so accordingly. 4. In the result, the judgment of the High Court is modified to the above extent and the appeal is disposed of accordingly.