Jheky] lnL;&;g fuxjkuh jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e 1955^ dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 230 ds vUrxZr jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj d fu.kZ; fnukad 16-7-2004 ds fo:} izLrqr dh xbZ gSA ¼2½ izdj.k ds la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd oknh ukFkw o vU; us ,d jktLo okn ?kks"k.kk o fu"ks/kkKk dk izfroknh dkuk o vU; ds fo:} vkjkth ua- 771 jdck 15 fcLok vkjkth ua- 778 jdck 3 ch?kk 9 fcLok okds xzke ipkj rglhy ftyk t;iqj ds lEcU/k esa mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] t;iqj izFke ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;kA i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ fopkj.k U;k;ky; us muds fu.kZ; fnukad 30-4-2001 }kjk oknhx.k dk okn [kkfjt dj fn;kA mDr fu.kZ; o fMØh ls O;fFkr gksdj oknh ukFkw o vU; us jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj ds le{k vihy izLrqr dhA vihy ds yfEcr jgrs oknhx.k dh vksj ls jkeflag us izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr vknsk 41 fu;e 27 flfoy izfdz;k lafgrk] 1908 ds rgr~ fnukad 8-6-2004 dks izLrqr dj izkFkZuk i= ds lkFk izLrqr nLrkostksa dks vfHkys[k ij ysus dk fuosnu fd;kA fnukad 15-7-2004 dks izfroknhx.k us tokc izLrqr dj izkFkZuk i= dks fujLr djus dk fuosnu fd;kA i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us muds vknsk fnukad 16-7-2004 }kjk izkFkhZx.k dk izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj dj fn;kA mDr vknsk ls O;fFkr gksdj oknhx.k@izkFkhZx.k ukFkw o vU; us izuxr fuxjkuh jktLo e.My jktLFkku, vtesj esa izLrqr dhA ¼3½ mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx; dks lquk x;k ,oa muds }kjk izLrqr rdksZ ij euu fd;k x;k rFkk vf/kuLFk U;k;ky; dh i=kofy;ksa dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA ¼4½ ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku cuke Vh- ,u- lgkuh ¼2001½ 10 ,l- lh- lh- 619 esa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS "It may be pointed out that this Cort, as long back as in 1963 in K. Bebkataramaih vs. Seetharama Reddy, AIR 1963 S.C. 1526 , pointed out the scope of unamended provision of Order 41 Rule 27 (c) that though there might the judgment on the state of record as it was, and so, it could not require additional evidence to enable it to pronounce the judgment. It still considered that in the interest of justice something which remained obsure should be filed up so that it cuold pronounce its judgment in a more satisfactory manner. It still considered that in the interest of justice something which remained obsure should be filed up so that it cuold pronounce its judgment in a more satisfactory manner. This is entirely for the Court to consider, at the time of hearing of the appeal on merits, whether the documents which are sought to be filed as additional evidence, need to be looked into to pronounce its judgment, in more satisfactory manner. If that be so, it is always open to the Court to look into the document and for the purpose, amended provision of Order 41 Rule 27(b), C.P.C. can be invoked. So the application under Order 41 Rule 27(b) should have been decided along with the appeal. Had the Court found the document necessary to pronounce the judgment in the appeal in a more satisfactory manner, it would have allowed the same, if not the same would have been dismissed at that stage. So the application under Order 41 Rule 27(b) should have been decided along with the appeal. Had the Court found the document necessary to pronounce the judgment in the appeal in a more satisfactory manner, it would have allowed the same, if not the same would have been dismissed at that stage. But taking a view on the application before hearing of the appeal, in our view would be imappropriate..............." mijksDr U;kf;d fl}kUr ds ifjizs{; esa ;g Li"V gS fd ;g lqfufpr djuk U;k;ky; dk vf/kdkj gS fd D;k vknsk 41 fu;e 27 flfoy izfdz;k lafgrk ds ek/;e ls izLrqr fd;s tkus okys nLrkostksa ds vk/kkj ij fookn dk fuLrkj.k lE;d :i ls fd;k tk ldrk gS vkSj mLrkost fu.kZ; esa lgk;d gS vFkok bu nLrkostksa dh izdj.k ds fuLrkj.k esa dksbZ mi;ksfxrk ugh gSA U;k;ky; ds fy, ;g rHkh laHko gS fd tc og izdj.k ds xq.kkxq.k dk iw.kZ ijh{k.k djsa] blls iwoZ vknsk 41 fu;e 27 flfoy izfdz;k lafgrk ds izkFkZuk i= ij fdlh izdkj dk vknsk ikfjr djuk mfpr ugh gksxkA izuxr izdj.k esa v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; us muds le{k yfEcr vihy dks xq.kkxq.k ij cgl lquus ls iwoZ gh vknsk 41 fu;e 27 flfoy izfdz;k lafgrk] 1908 ds izkFkZuk i= ij cgl lqudj viuk vknsk ikfjr dj fn;kA esjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa izuxr vknsk ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky }kjk 2001¼10½ ,l- lh- lh- 619 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; ds foifjr gS] bl dkj.k mlesa vf/kdkfjrk lEcU/kh =qfV gSA ¼5½ ifj.kker% ;g fuxjkuh vakr% Lohdkj dh tkrh gS rFkk v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vknsk fnukad 16-7-2004 fujLr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky; dks ;g funsZk fn;s tkrs gS fd os ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr mi;qDr fu.kZ; dks n`f"Vxr j[rs gq, vihy ds xq.kkxq.k ds lkFk gh izkFkZuk i= vUrxZr vknsk 41 fu;e 27 flfoy izfdz;k lafgrk ds ek/;e ls izLrqr fd;s x;s nLrkostksa dh fof/kd izklafxdrk ds lEcU/k esa vknsk ikfjr djrs gq, vihy dks fuLrkfjr djsaA ¼6½ i{kdkjksa dks funsZfkr fd;k tkrk gs fd os jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj ds U;k;ky; esa fnukad 28-3-2006 dsk mifLFkr gks tkosaA ¼7½ vknsk [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA