Judgment 1. The plaintiff has lost concurrently before the two courts below in a suit for mandatory injunction filed by her. It was claimed by the plaintiff that the defendants be directed to allow the plaintiff to raise construction of 3 feet wide staircase, at the place marked as ABCD, shown in the site plan, to reach the roof of the shop in question. 2. The suit was contested by the defendants and it was claimed by them that the aforesaid portion is a part and parcel of the tenanted premises and therefore, plaintiff had no right to construct the staircase as desired by her. Both the courts below have held that the verandah in question, where the staircase was sought to be constructed by the plaintiff, was a part of the tenanted portion with the defendants. In these circumstances, the suit filed by the plaintiff was dismissed and her appeal failed before the learned first appellate court. 3. Shri Jagdish Manchanda, learned counsel for the appellant has placed reliance upon a judgment dated November 25, 1991, passed in R. S. A. No.803 of 1979, wherein it has been held that roof of the shop in question was not a part of the tenanted premises. On that basis, Shri manchanda argues that the plaintiff had a right to raise the construction of staircase to reach the roof. 4. However, I find myself unable to agree with the aforesaid contention of the learned counsel. There is no dispute that the roof of the shop in question is not a part of tenancy. However, the dispute is with regard to place ABCD shown in the site plan. It has been categorically found as a fact by both the courts below that portion ABCD, marked in site plan, is a part of the tenanted premises. In these circumstances, the plaintiff can not be permitted to interfere in the possession of the tenants and allow to raise the construction. 5. Nothing has been shown that the findings recorded by both the courts below suffer from any infirmity or are contrary to the record. No question of law, much less any substantial question of law, arises in the present appeal Dismissed