Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 784 (RAJ)

Prem Singh v. State of Raj.

2006-03-07

M.S.KHAN

body2006
[kku] lnL; & ;g vihy jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh guqekux<+ ds fu.kZ; fnukad 2-8-02 ds fo:) jktLFkku Hkw jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ dh /kkjk 76 ds varxZr fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd ftyk dysDVj guqekux<+ ds U;k;ky; esa lksgu yky iq= nkukjke tkfr tkV fuoklh ryokM+k rglhy fVCch }kjk ,d izkFkZuk i= mifuosku vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 11 o 14 ds rgr izLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k fd pd 1 Vh ,y MCY;w esa [kkrk la[;k 152 i-ua- 238@299 fd-ua- 22] 23 a- ua- 239@300 fd-ua- 3] 4] 6] 7 dqy 6 ch?kk d`f"k Hkwfe othj flag us vkoaVu vf/kdkjh ds le{k rF; fNikdj vkoaVu djk yh tcfd othj flag uke dks dksbZ vkneh dHkh Hkh xzke ryokM+k esa ugha jgk ,oa vfLrRo esa ugha gSA vkoaVu vf/kdkjhg ds le{k lgh rF; lkeus yk;s tkrs rks othj flag vkoaVu dk vf/kdkjh ugha gksrkA vr% Hkwfe jkT; ljdkj ds gd esa vfHkxzfgr dh tkosA ftyk dysDVj us ckn tkap mHk; i{k dks lqudj vius fu.kZ; fnukad 16-5-2001 dss }kjk othj flg ds i{k esa fd;s x;s vkoaVu dks csukeh ik;s tkus ds dkj.k fujLr dj fn;kA blls O;fFkr gksdj vihykFkhZx.k us jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh guqekux<+ ds U;k;ky; esa vihy nk;j dh ftUgksaus vius fu.kZ; fnukad 2-8-2002 ds }kjk vihy [kkfjt dj nhA blls O;fFkr gksdj f}rh; vihyg e.My ds le{k isk dh xbZA e.My dh ,dy ihB ds iwoZ lnL; Jh ts-lh- egkfUr us vius fu.kZ; fnukad 30-9-2002 ds }kjk mDr vihy ,Mehku LVst ij gh [kkfjt dj nhA vihykFkhZx.k }kjk Lisky vihy nk;j djus ij e.My dh [k.MihB us vius fu.kZ; fnukad 25-8-2003 ds }kjk vihy Lohdkj dj ,dy ihB ds fu.kZ; fnukad 30-9-2002 dks fujLr dj izdj.k ,dy ihB ds le{k izLrqr djus vknsk ikfjr fd;sA 3- mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl lquh xbZA 4- vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd ftyk dysDVj }kjk ikfjr vknsk muds {ks=kf/kdkj ds ckgj gSA fooknxzLr Hkwfe othj flag dks dLVksfM;u foHkkx }kjk vkoaVu dh xbZ FkhA dLVksfM;u foHkkx }kjk vkoafVr Hkwfe ij mifuosku vf/kfu;e ds izko/kku ykxw ugha gksrs gS o dLVksfM;u foHkkx dh Hkwfe ds laca/k esa fdlh Hkh izdkj dh lquokbZ dk vf/kdkj ftyk dysDVj dks ugha gSA vihyk.V crkSj fu.kZ; ikfjr dj fn;kA vius dFkuksa ds leFkZu esa vkj-vkj-Mh- 1980 ist 311 vkj-vkj-Mh- 1997 ist 9 Mh-ch- jktLFkku gkbZdksVZ dh uthjsa isk dhA 5- jkT; ljdkj dh vksj ls mi jktdh; vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd fu.kZ; fnukad 16-5-01 ds }kjk othj flag ds i{k esa fd;k x;k vkoaVu fujLr fd;k x;k gSA mDr fu.kZ; ds fo:) vihykFkhZ us crkSj dszrk r`rh; i{kdkj vihy izLrqr dhA vihykFkhZ mDr Hkwfe dks tfj;s bdjkjukek [kjhn djuk crkrs gSA vihykFkhZ ua- 2 o 3 tfj;s cSukek [kjhnuk crkrs gSA vihykFkhZ dks ftyk dysDVj ds fu.kZ; ds fo:) vihy djus dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha gSA D;ksafd ftyk dysDVj us othj flag dks fd;k x;k vkoaVu cSukeh ekudj fujLr djus dk fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gSA vkoaVu vknsk dks fujLr djus ds laca/k esa dsoy vkoaVh gh pqukSfr ns ldrk gS D;ksafd mDr fu.kZ; ds fo:) dksbZ vihy ugha dj ldrsA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us iwjh tkap dj fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dh i=koyh esa layXu rglhynkj fVCch dh fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj othj flag uke dk dksbZ O;fDr dHkh vkckn ugha jgkA fooknxzLr Hkwfe vkt Hkh jktLo fjdkMZ esa othj flag ds uke ls ntZ gSA vr% vihykFkhZ dks vihy izLrqr djus dk dksbZ fof/kd vf/kdkj ugha gSA mUgksaus vius i{k ds leFkZu esa vkj-vkj-lh- 1999 ist 112] vkj-vkj-Mh- 1995 ist 172] vkj-vkj-Mh- 1993 ist 232 dh uthjsa isk dhA viuh cgl ds var esa crk;k fd ewy vkoaVh }kjk ;g vkoaVu feF;k lwpuk ,oa fel fjiztsUVsku vkWQ QsDV~l ds vk/kkj ij izkIr djuk ik;k tkrk gS tSlk fd ftyk dysDVj ds fu.kZ; ls Li"V gSA vr% mUgksaus bl izdkj ds vkoaVu dks fujLr djuk mfpr crk;kA vius i{k ds leFkZu esa vkj-vkj-Mh- 2002 ist 1 dh uthj isk dhA 6- geusa mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- ftyk dysDVj guqekux<+ us vius fu.kZ; fnukad 16-5-2001 esa ;g fu"d"kZ fudkyk gS fd odhy vizkFkhZ Hkwfe dk cspku 76 esa gksuk rFkk mlds ipkr~ cgSfl;r bdjkjukek cS; ds vuqlkj dkfct gksuk crykrs gSA fdUrq mu }kjk cSukek dh izfr vFkok bdjkjukek dh izfr lk{; esa izLrqr ugha dh gSA rglhynkj dh fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj Hkh ewy vkoaVh othj flag uked O;fDr dks dHkh ryokM+k esa vkckn gksuk ugha cryk;k gSA dCtk/kkjh Hkwfe dks dz; djuk crykrs gS fdUrq dksbZ nLrkost isk ugha djrs gSA bl lcls ;g ik;k tkrk gS fd vkoaVu csukeh gS rFkk vizkFkhZ Hkwfe ij uktk;r :i ls dkfct gSA vr% pd 1 Vh-,y-MCY;w-ch- ds i-ua- 298@299 fd-ua- 22-23 i-ua- 239@300 fd-ua- 3] 4] 6] 7 dqy 6 ch?kk Hkwfe dk vkoaVu csukeh ik;s tkus ds dkj.k fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA bldh vihy jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh guqekux<+ ds U;k;ky; esa gksus ij mUgksaus vius fu.kZ; esa ;g fu"d"kZ fudkyk gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us /kkjk 11@14 mifuosku vf/kfu;e ds rgr izLrqr fkdk;r ds vk/kkj ij Hkwfe fjT;weg djus dk vknsk ikfjr fd;k gSA vihyk.V la[;k 1 us bdjkjukek ds vk/kkj ij o vihyk.V la[;k 2 o 3 ds vk/kkj ij Hkwfe ij dkfctg gksus dk dFku djrs gq, crkSj izHkkfor i{kdkj vihy izLrqr djus dh vuqefr pkgh gSA vihy esa xq.k voxq.k ij fu.kZ; ls iwoZ ;g fu/kkZj.k fd;k tkuk vko;d gS fd vk;k vihyk.V crkSj r`rh; i{kdkj izHkkfor O;fDr vihy izLrqr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us fkdk;r ds vk/kkj ij Hkwfe fjT;we djus dk vknsk ikfjr fd;k gSA jsLiksaMs.V~l }kjk izLrqr U;kf;d n`"VkUr vkj-vkj-Mh- 1995 ist 172 esa ekuuh; jktLo e.My dh o`gn ihB ds }kjk izHkkfor i{kdkj ds laca/k esa foLr`r foospu djds ;g fu/kkZj.k fd;k gS fd fkdk;rdrkZ dks vihy izLrqr djus dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha gS ,oa vkoaVu ds laca/k eaas dh xbZ fkdk;r ij ikfjr fd;s x;s fu.kZ; ds fo:) vihy ;k fuxjkuh izLrqr djus dk vf/kdkj dsoy ek= vkoaVh o jkT; ljdkj dks gSA vkj-ch-ts- 1997 ist 551 esa Hkh ;gh fu/kkZj.k fd;k x;k gSA vkj-vkj-lh- 1999 ist 112 esa ;g fu/kkZj.k fd;k x;k gS fd /kkjk 13 mifuosku vf/kfu;e ds rgr fjT;we dh xbZ Hkwfe ds fo:) ,xzhesaV ds vk/kkj ij dkfct O;fDr dks vihy izLrqr djus dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha gSA vkj-vkj-Mh- 1993 ist 232 esa ;g fu/kkZj.k fd;k gS fd ;fn dksbZ O;fDr fMdzh esa i{kdkj u gks rks vihy izLrqr djus ls iwoZ /kkjk 96 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr U;k;ky; dh Lohd`r izkIr djuh vko;d gSA vihyk.V us ;g vihy crkSj r`rh; i{kdkj izLrqr dh gS o /kkjk 96 lh-ih-lh- dk izkFkZuk i= Hkh izLrqr fd;k gS ijUrq vihy izLrqr ds lkFk mDr izkFkZuk i= ij Lohd`fr izkIr ugh dh gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 11@14 mifuosku vf/kfu;e ds rgr Hkwfe fjT;we djus dk vknsk ikfjr fd;k gS ,oa mDr vknsk ds fo:) crkSj izHkkfor i{kdkj dszrk ;g vihy izLrqr gqbZ gS ijUrq U;kf;d n`"VkUr vkj-vkj-Mh- 1995 ist 172 o vkj-ch-ts- 1997 ist 551 ds vuqlkj vkoaVu fujLr djus ds izdj.k esa vihy djus dk vf/kdkj dsoy ek= vkoaVh dks gh gSA dszrk dks vihy izLrqr djus dk dksbZ vf/kdkj ugha gSA blfy, vihyk.V izHkkfor i{kdkj ugha gksus ds dkj.k o fcuk vuqefr vihy izLrqr dh xbZ gksus ds dkj.k [kkfjt ;ksX; curh gS o v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; esa fdlh izdkj ds gLr{ksi dh vko;drk ugha gSA ge nksuksa gh v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds leorhZ fu"d"kksZa ls viuh lgefr O;Dr djrs gSA blds vfrfjDr bl izdj.k esa ;g rF; lokZf/kd egRoiw.kZ gS fd tkap esa ewy vkoaVh othjflag dk mlds }kjk vius vkoaVu izkFkZuk i= esa crk;s x;s irs ij jguk gh ugha ik;k x;k tSlk fd rglhynkj dh fjiksVZ fnukad 5-7-2000 ls Li"V gS ftlesa dgk x;kg gS fd mDr Hkwfe ij izseflag dchj flag] vej flag filjku fujatu flag tkfr lSuh fl[k lk- ryokM+k >hy ¼lSfu;kas dh <k.kh½ ds dCtk dkr esa gSA vkoaVh othj flag ds ckjs esa foLr`r iwNrkN djus ij ik;k fd mDr uke dk dksbZ O;fDr dHkh ryokM+k >hy esa vkckn gksuk ugha crk;k x;kA dCtk /kkfj;ksa us crk;k fd mDr Hkwfe geusa [kjhn dh gS ysfdu bl laca/k esa dksbZ nLrkost miyC/k ugha gqvkA orZeku tekcanh dh udy layXu dj fjiksVZ Jheku~ th dh lsok esa isk gSA orZeku vihykFkhZ bl Hkwfe dh ikoj vkWQ vVkWuhZ ls dz; djuk crkrs gSA bl bdjkjukes dh ewy izfr;ka Hkh i=koyh esa izLrqr ugha dh xbZ gSA gekjh jk; esa bl izdkj ds bdjkjukes ds vk/kkj ij Hkwfe ds fodz; dks ekU;rk ugha nh tk ldrhA bl izdj.k esa tc ewy vkoaVh dk gh irk ugha py jgk gS rks fQj vihykFkhZ ewy vkoaVh ds ikoj vkWQ vVkWuhZ ls Hkwfe dz; djuk crkrs gS tks fjdkWMZ ij miyC/k ugha gSA oSls Hkh bf.M;u jftLVªsku ,DV ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj ;g fodz; 100@& :i;s ls vf/kd dk gS ftldk iath;u gksuk vko;d gSA i=koyh ds voyksdu ls ;g Hkh fofnr gksrk gS fd ;g vkoaVu feF;k lwpuk ds vk/kkj ij izkIr fd;k x;k gSA vr% bl izdkj ds vkoaVu dks fujLr fd;k tkuk gekjh jk; esa loZFkk dkuwuh izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj mfpr gSA bl laca/k esa vkj-vkj-Mh- 2002 ist 1 esa jktLFkku U;k;ky; dh [k.MihB }kjk ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS fd& Raj. Land Revenue (Allotment of Land for Agricultural Purposes) Rule, 1970, Rule 14(4) — Long lapse of time cannot be considered sufficient to save such allotment order obtained by misrepresentation — Order of Collector not liable to be interfered with. 8- tgka rd vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd dh bl nyhy dk izu gS fd ;g Hkwfe dLVksfM;u foHkkx dh gS blfy;s ftyk dysDVj dks mifuosku vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 11] 14 ds rgr {ks=kf/kdkj izkIr ugha gSA bl laca/k esa muds }kjk tks uthjsa isk dh xbZ gS og bl izdj.k ds foks"k rF;ksa ds ifjizs{; esa ykxw ugha gksrh gSA jktLo e.My ,oa loksZPp U;k;ky; ds }kjk ;g vfHker O;Dr fd;k x;k gS fd tc ,deqr ;kstuk ds varxZr iquokZl foHkkx dh Hkwfe jkT; ljdkj dks gLrkarfjr gks tkrh gS rks ml ij jkT; ljdkj dk vkf/kiR; gks tkrk gS blfy;s mu ij ml jkT; ds gh fu;e ykxw gksrs gSA vkj-vkj-Mh- 1986 ist 523 esa ;g dgk x;k gS fd& "Raj. Land Revenue Act, Sec. 76 - Raj. L.R. (Permanent Allotment of Evacuee Agrl. Land) Rules, 1963 - Preamable - Application of L (non-petitioner No. 5) for revoking order directing petitioner C to deposit amount under Rules of 63, rejected by Teh.-cun-M.O. -Appeal, accepted by Collector-R.A.A. held that second appeal, maintainable u/s. 76 - Board in revision held that appeal before R.A.A. u/s. 76, not maintainable - Held, forum of appeals shall be as provided under provisions of the Act if land in dispute was of nature as dealt with in the Rules and has to be allotted under the Rules - Hence appeal against order of Collector lay to R.A.A. and revision lay to Board against order of R.A.A. - Error, apparent on face of order of Board in as much as without going to root of case, as to whether disputed land, covered under the Rules, it held that appeal did not lie u/s. 76 before R.A.A. Order, quashed and case remanded to Board." (Para 3) Para 3. It will therefore, be clear that such of the lands which were evacuee property under the Evacuee Property Act, 1950 (Central Act, 1950) and which had been allotted as evacuee property to non-claimants as a measure of rehabilitation for cultivation and; which lands were acquired by the Central Government by notification No. 5113/3 (14) 5511 dated 6th April, 1955 stood transferred to the State Government on payment of Rs. 1 crore. To confer rights on the non-claimants to whom the land have been allotted, the rules were framed under the powers conferred in the State Government by Section 251 of the Act read with Sections 101 and 102 of the Act and the proviso to Section 34 , of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955. Therefore, if the lands in dispute were such which were covered under the rules, then the forum of appeal/appeals will be as provided in the Act. As already stated earlier none of the two courts below, either the learned Revenue Appellate Authority or the learned Board of Revenue have addressed themselves to this aspect of the matter. Without addressing themselves to this aspect of the matter, the question as to whether an appeal under Section 76 of the Act lay before the Revenue Appellate Authority could not be decided. In my opinion, there is no doubt that if the land in dispute is of the nature as dealt with in the rules and has to be allotted under the aforesaid rules, the forum of appeals shall be as provided under the provisions of the Act. The appeal against the order of the Collector shall lie to the Revenue Appellate Authority and against the order of the learned Revenue Appellate Authority passed in Second Appeal a revision will lie to the Board of Revenue under the provisions of the Land Revenue Act, 1956. There is an error apparent on the face of the order of the Board of Revenue, in as much as, without going to the root of the case, as to whether the land in dispute was such which was covered under the rules, it held that an appeal did not lie under Section 76 of the Act before the Revenue Appellate Authority. blh izdkj 1988 vkj-vkj-Mh- 279 ij Hkh jktLo e.My ds ekuuh; lnL; Jh jktsUnz lDlsuk us j.kthrflag cuke~ /;kuflag ds izdj.k esa fofHkUu U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dks dksV djrs gq, ;g vfHker O;Dr fd;k Fkk fd& (a) Rajasthan Land Revenue (Permanent Allotment of Evacuee Agricultural Land) Rules, 1963 - Land covered by these rules has ceased to be an evacuee property after 1963 and same is not governed by Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 or Displaced Persons Compensation and Rehabilitation Act, 1954 -an appeal against order of Collector lies to Revenue Appellate Authority - L986 R.R.D. (H.C.) 523, followed - 1973 R.R.D. 218 & 1975 R.R.D. 474 distinguished. Para 6. I have pondered over the rival contentions and given my thoughtful consideration thereon. The State Government in exercise of powers conferred by Section 261 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 read with Sections 101 and 102 of the said Act and the proviso to Section 34 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, and all other powers enabling it in this behalf has framed Rules, 1963 by its notification N.F. 3-1 (15) RR/61 dated April. 1986. It will be useful to quote the preamble which is detailed ad infra;- "Notification No. F.3-1 (15) RB/61, dated 8th April, 1963 -"Whereas certain agricultural lands of Muslim evacuees situated in the districts of Alwar and Bharatpur were declared, or are deemed to have been declared, as evacuee property under the administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 (Central Act 13 of 1950); And whereas the said lands were allotted by the Custodian of Evacuee property to non-claimant displaced persons, as a measure of rehabilitation, for temporary cultivation; And whereas the said lands were subsequently acquired by the Central Government by Notification No. 2 (S.IH/5(14) 55 I) dated the 6th April 1955 issued in exercise of the power conferred by Sec. 12 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 (Central Act 44 of 1951); And whereas khatedari rights under the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (Rajasthan Act 3 of 1955) have not accrued to the occupants of the said lands; And whereas, with a view to assist the said non-claimant displaced persons in their permanent rehabilitation on the said lands, the Rajasthan State Government has got the said lands transferred to it from out the Compensation Pool on payment of an ad hoc sum of Rupees one crore to the Central Government. And whereas it is desirable to make rules for the permanent allotment of the said lands to the said persons and the conferment of rights therein." Para 7. Thus it is manifest that the agricultural lands of Muslim Evacuees situated in the districts of Alwar and Bharatpur were declared as Evacuee Property under the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950. The said lands were allotted by the Custodian of Evacuee Property to non-claimant displaced persons, as a measure of rehabilitation for temporary cultivation such lands were subsequently acquire by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 12 of Act, 1954. Admittedly khatedari rights under the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 had not accrued to the occupants of such allotted lands. The Rajasthan State therefore, with a view to assist such non-claimant displaced persons in their permanent rehabilitation got such lands transferred to it from out of compensation pool on payment on an adhoc sum of Rupees One Crore to the Central Government sometime before 1963 and thereafter such land are now owned by the Rajasthan State. Such lands here, thereafter such lands are now owned by the Rajasthan State. Such lands here, therefore, now ceased to he Evacuee Properties and are not under the Management and Administration of the Custodian of Evacuee Property anymore. The Rajasthan Government has, framed Rules, 1963 for the permanent allotment of such lands to such displaced persons and for the conferment of rights therein. Rule 3 projects the scope of Rules, 1963. It provides that Rules, 1963 shall govern the permanent allotment of, and the accrual of khatedari rights in agricultural lands situated in the districts of Alwar and Bharatpur that were declared, or are deemed to have been declared, as evacuee Property under the Administration of Evacuee Act, 195 and that were subsequently acquired by the Government o$ India under the Displaced Person (Compensation and Rehabilitation Act, 1954) and that all such lands have now been transferred to Rajasthan Government on payment of an agreed price, for allotment to non-claimant-displaced persons and other persons. Rule 5 lays down the terms and condition of permanent allotment. It provides that the allottee shall acquire khatedari rights in the land only if he fulfills each and every one of the terms and conditions specified. It further provides that the allottee shall pay the price of the land and the interest at the prescribed rate. Rule 5 lays down the terms and condition of permanent allotment. It provides that the allottee shall acquire khatedari rights in the land only if he fulfills each and every one of the terms and conditions specified. It further provides that the allottee shall pay the price of the land and the interest at the prescribed rate. Sub-Rule (7) of Rule 5 specifically mentions that all transfere made, or encumbrances created, at any time in contravention of the provisions of Rules, 1963 shall be null and void and if the allottee refuses to pay the price of the land as well as the arrears of any loans outstanding against him, or when the non-claimant displaced persons has left the land in the possession of some other person and is not trespasser, it shall be competent for the Tehsildar to cancel the allotment and take over the possession of the land and where necessary eject the person in possession! in Accordance with the provisions of Section 91 of Rajasthan Council Revenue Act. Thus Rules, 1963 contain a detailed procedure for making permanent allotment to such allottees and conferring on them khatedari rights. Hence as per provisions of Rules 1963 the; disputed allotted lands has now ceased to be an evacuee property after 1963 and the same is not governed by the Administration1 of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 or Displaced Persons, Compensation and Rehabilitation Act, 1954. Para 10. On the other hand in Chhida vs. Board of Revenue 1986 RRD (H.C.) 523 the High Court while interpreting the preamble to Rules, 1963 has held that lands allotted to non-claimant displaced persons as evacuee property under the Evacuee Property Act, 1950 have now vested in the State Government and that provisions of Act, 1954 do not apply to such lands. It has been further held that an appeal against the order passed under Rules, 1963 lies before the Revenue Appellate Authority. Para 11. Hence I am of the considered opinion that the impugned order of Collector was passed under Rules, 1963, that the provisions of Act, 1954 do not apply in such a case and thet the Revenue Appellate Authority had the jurisdiction to entertain and decide the appeal under Section 75 Rajasthan Land Revenue Act and as such his impugned judgment is not without jurisdiction. I, therefore, repel Shri P.K. Jains arguments on this count. I, therefore, repel Shri P.K. Jains arguments on this count. blh izdkj ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1988 ,llh ist 873 esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us bl uthj esa ekuuh; U;k;k/khk Jh ,-ih- lsu ,oa Jh ch-lh- js dh ihB us Civil Appeal No. 1088(N) of 1969, D/- 22.7.1987 Pala Singh (Deceased) By Lrs., Appellant vs. Union of India and others, Respondents ds izdj.k esa ;g fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k Fkk fd& H.Note - "Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (44 of 1954), S. 24 — Allotment of land in excess of entitlement to displaced person — Land covered by Package Deal — Vests in State Government — Purchase of land by displaced person — Managing Officer, Rehabilitation not competent to grant permission. (Punjab Package Deal Properties (Disposal) Rules, (1976), Rr. 4, 8). (Punjab Package Deal Properties (Disposal) Rules, (1976), Rr. 4, 8). 9- vr% {ks=kf/kdkj ds fcUnq ij vihykFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd }kjk mBkbZ xbZ vkifRr;ka ekU; ugha gSA ge jktdh; vfHkHkk"kd dh bl nyhy ls Hkh lger gS fd vihykFkhZ ds ikl fooknxzLr Hkwfe dks dz; djus dk dksbZ fooluh; nLrkost ugha gSA dsoy bdjkjukek gS ftudks jftLVªsku ,DV ds izko/kkuksas ds vuqlkj lafnX/k gksus ds dkj.k ekU;rk iznku djuk mfpr ugha gSA bl izdkj ds bdjkjukes ds vk/kkj ij dzsrkvksa dks vihy djus dks dksbZ yksdl izkIr ugha gksrk gS D;ksafd bl izdj.k esa ewy vkoaVh vihy esa ugha vk;s gSA bl laca/k esa vkj-vkj-Mh- 1995 ist 172 esa dgk x;k gS fd& Rajasthan Land Revenue (Allotment of Land for Agriculture Purpose) Rules, 1970 Rule 14(4) — A person aggrieved by an allotment order should seek remedy by way of appeal u/s. 75 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act — Cancellation of allotment under Rule 14(4) is a matter between the allottee and the State — The status of an applicant who seeks cancellation of an allotment is that of an informer or complainant and not of a party to the proceedings — He may be heard by the Collector but only for the limited purpose of effective disposal of his application — In the event of cancellation of the allotment, the only aggrieved party is the allottee who can seek redress by way of appeal — The applicant (complainant) is not a necessary party to the appeal as no relief is sought against him but if he is joined as a respondent in the appeal by way of abundant caution, if does not consider on him any right to continue the litigation in second appeal — If the allotment is restored in appeal, the State Govt. alone will be the aggrieved party which may, if it so desires, go in second appeal — Therefore, where the order of cancellation of allotment passed by the Collect or is reversed in an appeal filed by the allottee, the applicant (complainant) can in no case file a second appeal. vkj-ch-ts- 1997 esa dgk x;k gS fd& Rajasthan Land Revenue (Allotment of Land for Agricultural Purposes) Rules, 1970, Rule 14(4) — Complainant has no right of appeal or revision — The revision petitions are not maintainable as the complainants have no locus standi to file either second appeal or revision. vkj-ch-ts- 1997 esa dgk x;k gS fd& Rajasthan Land Revenue (Allotment of Land for Agricultural Purposes) Rules, 1970, Rule 14(4) — Complainant has no right of appeal or revision — The revision petitions are not maintainable as the complainants have no locus standi to file either second appeal or revision. blds vfrfjDr jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds fu.kZ; ls ;g Hkh Li"V gksrk gS fd mUgksaus bl vihy dh /kkjk 96 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr U;k;ky; ls vihy djus dh fof/kor~ Lohd`fr izkIr ugha djuk Hkh crk;k gSA i=koyh ds voyksdu ls fofnr gksrk gS fd vihykFkhZ us muds U;k;ky; esa /kkjk 96 lh-ih-lh- dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k ysfdu Lohd`fr izkIr ugha dh] tks dkuwuh izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj vko;d gSA 10- vr% mijksDr of.kZr leLr rF;ksa dkuwuh izko/kkuksa ,oa U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq;s ;g vihy [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh guqekux<+ ds fu.kZ; fnukad 2-8-02 ,oa ftyk dysDVj guqekux<+ ds fu.kZ; fnukad 16-5-01 dks ;Fkkor j[kk tkrk gSA ftyk dysDVj guqekux<+ dks funsZk fn;s tkrs gS fd mDr Hkwfe dk ;Fkkkh?kz jkT; ljdkj vius dCts esa ysosA 11- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA