Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 789 (RAJ)

State of Raj. v. Jas Giri & Ors.

2006-03-07

M.S.KHAN

body2006
[kku] lnL;-&;g jsQjsUl vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj ikyh }kjk vius vknsk fnukad 28-1-03 ds }kjk jktLo e.My vtesj dks izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA 2- la{ksi esa izdj.k ds rF; bl izdkj gS fd rglhynkj lkstr us v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj fuosnu fd;k fd fely cUnkscLr lEor 2010 ls 2019 esa xzke e.Myk ds iqjkus [kljk uEcj 657 o 224 jdck 24 ch?kk 6 fcLok Hkwfe Mksyh cuke efUnj eB egknso th ds uke ntZ FkhA ftls iqjkuh us vius uke ntZ djok dj vizkFkhZx.k dks gLrkUrfjr dj nha vr% Mksyh dh Hkwfe dks iqtkjh }kjk vius uke [kkrsnkjh djkdj vU; dks gLrkUrj.k dj fn;s tkus ds QyLo:i mDr gLrkUrj.k jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 46¼1½ ds foijhr gksus ls fookfnr Hkwfe iqu% ewfrZ efUnj ds uke dh tkosA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us i{kdkjku dks lqudj fooknxzLr vkjkth okil ewfrZ efUnj ds uke ntZ djus gsrq ;g jsQjsUl e.My dks izsf"kr fd;k x;k gSA 3- mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl lquh xbZA 4- izkFkhZ jkT; ljdkj dh vksj ls mi jktdh; vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd fooknxzLr Hkwfe ewfrZ efUnj ,oa lkoZtfud mi;ksx dh gSA vr% mUgksaus bl Hkwfe dks iqu% ewfrZ efUnj ds uke ntZ djus dh izkFkZuk dhA vius i{k ds leFkZu esa vkjvkjMh 1994 ist 1] vkjvkjMh 1993 ist 411 ,oa ttesV Vw Ms ekpZ 2004 ,llhikVZ&1 esa izdkfkr fu.kZ; i`Foh yky cuke cksMZ vkQ jsosU;w ,.M vnlZ dh uthjsa isk dhA 5- vizkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd vfrfjDr dysDVj ds U;k;ky; esa vizkFkhZx.k dks uksfVl dh rkehy ugha gqbZA fooknxzLr Hkwfe efUnj dh [kqndkr dh Hkwfe gksus ds lEcU/k esa dksbZ jsdkMZ i=koyh ij miyC/k ugha gSA vr% bl Hkwfe dks efUnj ds uke ugha fd;k tkuk pkfg;sA vius dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkjvkjMh 2000 ist 19] 114] dh uthj isk dhA blds vfrfjDr ;g jsQjsUl vR;f/kd foyEc ls isk fd;k x;k gS ftls [kkfjt fd;k tkuk pkfg;sA bl lEcU/k esa mUgksaus vkjvkjMh 1993 ist 411 dh uthj isk dhA 6- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- vfrfjDr dysDVj us vius jsQjsUl fu.kZ; esa ;g fu"d"kZ fudkyk gS fd fookfnr Hkwfe fely cUnkscLr lEor 2010 ls 2019 esa xzke e.Myk ds [kljk uEcj 657 o 224 Mksyh cuk efUnj eB egknso fojkteku lkstr o /kU/ksMh ntZ gSA mDr Hkwfe dks rRdkyhu iqtkjh tlfxjh ,oa kadjukFk us vkxkeh tekcUnh lEor 2021 ls 2024 dh rS;kjh djrs le; iVokjh ls feydj fcuk dlh l{ke vf/kdkjh ds vknsk vFkok ukekUrjdj.k ds lh/ks gh tekcUnh esa vius uke [kkrsnkjh ntZ djokdj vU; dks gLrkUrfjr dj nhA efUnj ewfrZ dh Hkwfe fdlh dks gLrkUrfjr ugha gks ldrh gSA bl izdkj efUnj ewfrZ dh Hkwfe dk gLrkUrj.k fof/k ds vuqdwy ugha gSA ge vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj ds mDr fu"d"kZ ls lger gSA 8- ewfrZ efUnj lrr vo;Ld gS ftldh Hkwfe dk gLrkUrj.k /kkjk 46 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e ds izko/kkuksa ds foijhr gSA tSlk fd vkjvkjMh 1994 ist 1 esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ikfjr fd;k gSA jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ds mDr fu.kZ; dks ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us ttesV Vw Ms ekpZ 2004 ,llh ikVZ&1 esa izdkfkr fu.kZ; i`Fohyky cuke cksMZ vkQ jsosU;w ,.M vnlZ ds dsl esa vigsYM fd;k gSA ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fuEu izdkj ls gS& Having heard learned counsel of the parties on either side, we are satisfied that the common impugned order which is under challenge in these appeals, does not call for interference at the hands of this Court. The High Court has elaborately considered the respective contentions looking to the facts and also the record as well as the position of law. In the view, it is unnecessary to us to suport them again at we agree with the conclusions recorded by the High Court. tgka rd jsQjsUl foyEc ls izLrqr djus dk izu gS] bl lEcU/k esa vkjvkjMh 1993 ist 411 esa dgk x;k gS fd& Limitation Act, Section 3- Entries regarding title changed by Asstt. Land Records Officer on the basis of application by opposite party though during settlement operations existing entries can be changed only in accordance with decree, judgment of competent Court, legal transfer deed or order of Court - Order, void abinitio and could be set aside at any time- No question of limitation involved - Order of settlement Commissioner, setting aside impugned order cannot be assailed. 9- vr% mijksDr rF;ksa] dkuwuh izko/kkuksa ,oa U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, vfrfjDr ftyk dysDVj ikyh }kjk izLrqr ;g jsQjsUl Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk xzke e.Myk ds iqjkus [kljk uEcj 657 o 224 jdck 24 ch?kk 6 fcLok gky [kljk uEcj 939] 602 o 603 jdck 8-37 gsDVs;j Hkwfe Mksyh cuke efUnj eB egknso th ds uke ntZ djus ds vknsk fn;s tkrs gSA 10- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA