Research › Search › Judgment

Jharkhand High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 887 (JHR)

Lafarge India Employees Union v. State Of Jharkhand

2006-07-18

SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA

body2006
ORDER S.J. Mukhopadhaya, A.C.J. 1. Petitioner, in this writ petition, has challenged the order dated 4th October, 2001, passed by the Labour Commissioner-cum-Registrar of Trade Unions, whereby and whereunder, the said authority has observed that the practice of deduction of Membership fee from the wages, popularly known as Check off System, is undemocratic. 2. The main ground taken by the petitioner is that the Labour Commissioner either in his capacity or in the capacity of Registrar of Trade Unions has no such jurisdiction to make any observation as to whether the deduction of Membership fee from the wages, popularly known as Check Off System, is democratic or not. Learned Counsel has also relied on Section 7(2)(kkk) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 in sup port of deduction, which reads as follows: 7. Deductions which may be made from wages.(1) xxx xxx xxx xxx (2) Deductions from the wages of an employed person shall be made only in accordance with the provisions of (his Act, and may be of the following kinds only, namely:(a) xxx xxx xxx xxx (kkk) deduction made, with the written authorization of the employed person, for payment of the fees payable by him for the membership of any trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926 (16 of 1926). 3. 4th respondent has appeared and supported the claim of the petitioner that the Labour Commissioner-cum-Registrar. Trade Unions, has no such jurisdiction. 4. Counsel appearing on behalf of the State also could not lay hand on any provision of law to state that the said authority has any jurisdiction to give declaration with regard to any action of the Union in the matter of deduction of Membership fees from the wages. 5. In the facts and circumstances, the impugned order dated 4th October. 2001, having been passed by the Labour Commissioner-cum-Registrar of Trade Unions, being without jurisdiction is hereby set aside and the writ petition is. thus, allowed.