Research › Search › Judgment
Rajasthan High Court · body
2006 DIGILAW 887 (RAJ)
Mangya v. Prithvi Singh
2006-03-20
M.S.KHAN
body2006
[kku] lnL; & ;g eUVsEiV izkFkZuk i= jktLo e.My ds vknsk fnukad 16-4-02 dh ikyuk ugh djus ckcr izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA 2- izkFkZuk i= dUVsEiV esa dFku fd;k x;k gS fd izkFkhZx.k us jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh dksVk ds fu.kZ; fnukad 11-3-02 ds fo:} jktLo e.My esa fuxjkuh isk dhA e.My us nksuksa i{kksa dks lqudj vknsk fnukad 16-4-02 ds }kjk fuxjkuh ,MfeV dj dCts dh ekStwnk fLFkfr dks dk;e j[kkA mDr vknsk dh tkudkjh vizkFkhZx.kksa dks mlh fnu gks pqdh Fkh D;ksafd mDr vknsk muds odhy Jh vfuy kekZ dh mifLFkfr esa ikfjr fd;k x;k FkkA mDr vknsk lEcfU/kr vf/kdkjh;ksa dks Hkh rkehy gks pqdk gS mlds ckotwn Hkh vizkFkhZx.k us ekSds dh fLFkfr dks ifjofrZr dj enk[kyr dj jgs gSA vizkFkhZx.kksa }kjk dh tkus okyh dk;Zogh dUVsEiv vkQ dksVZ dh ifjHkk"kk esa vkrh gSA vr% dUVsEiV izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkdj jktLo e.My ds vknsk fnukad 16-4-02 dh ikyuk djus gsrq lEcfU/kr vf/kdkjh;ksa ,oa vizkFkhZx.k dks ikcUn fd;k tkosA 3- vizkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd us viuh cgl esa crk;k fd izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd ,slk dksbZ rF; ugh crk ik;s gS ftlls fd U;k;ky; ds vknsk dh vogsyuk gksuk ik;k tkrk gksA mUgksus ;g Hkh dFku f;k fd dkuwuh izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj dUVsEiV dk vkosnu vknsk dh fnukad ls ,d o"kZ dh le;kof/k ds vUnj izLrqr fd;k tkuk pkfg;s tks fd dkuwuh izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj vfuok;Z gS fdUrq bl izdj.k esa ,slk ugh gqvk gSA vius dFku ds leFkZu esa vkjvkjMh 1998 ist 225 vkjvkjMh 1989 ist 771 dh uthjs isk dhA mUgksus dFku fd;k fd izkFkhZ ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd fdlh Hkh rjhds ls U;k;ky; ds vknsk dh vogsyuk fl} ugh dj ik;s gSA vius i{k ds leFkZu es mUgksus vkjvkjMh 2001 ist 136] MCY;w,ylh 2001 ist 689 uthjs isk dhA 4- geus mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl ij euu fd;k ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;kA 5- ftl vknsk ds fo:} voekuuk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS og vknsk fnukad 16-4-02 dk gS tks fuEu izdkj ls Fkk & LFkxu vknsk ds lEcU/k es mHk; i{k dks lquk tkdj U;k; fgr esa vknsk fn;s tkrs gS fd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh dksVk ds fu.kZ; fnukad 11-3-02 ds vUrxZr fookfnr vkjkth dh orZeku fLFkfr e.My ds vU; vknsk rd ;Fkkor dk;e j[kh tkosA rnuqlkj vgdke lEcfU/kr U;k;ky;ksa dks ikyukFkZ tkjh gksA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k izkIr fd;k tkdj i=koyh cgl gsrw fnukad 12-8-2002 dks isk gksA bl vknsk dh fdl izdkj ls vogsyuk gqbZ] ;g izkFkhZ ds }kjk vius dUVsEiV izkFkZuk i= esa crk;sa x;s rF;ksa ls lkfcr ugh gksrk gSA bl lEcU/k esa vkjvkjMh 2001 ist 136 esa dgk x;k gS fd & Contempt of Court Act, 1971, Section 15(2), (13) - Contempt application against Tehsildar for not obeying the orders of the Single Bench - Held certified copy of the order of single Bench dt.
6.6.2000 and 13.6.2000 has not been enclosed with the application - No evidence of service to Tehsildar produced - No application for condonation of delay to produce certified copy of order filed - Affidavit filed by petitioner disclosed the fact that he has not received the certified copy of the order but has come to the knowledge about the fact of stay - Tehsildar not bound to act upon the affidavit. blh izdkj MCY,ylh 2001 jkt- ;wlh ist 689 ij Hkh ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk dgk x;k gS fd & Contempt of Court - Evidence - in absence of any independent evidence contemner cannot be said to have committed violation of order of Court - in case in hand, no evidence of raising of height of walls in disobedience of order of Court. 6- blds vfrfjDr bl dUVsEiV izkFkZuk i= esa e.My ds vknsk fnukad 16-4-02 dh vogsyuk dk vkjksi izkFkhZx.k }kjk yxk;k x;k gSA dfFkr voekuuk gq;s rhu o"kZ ls vf/kd dh vof/k chr pqdh gSa vUrxZr /kkjk 20 dUVsEiV vkQ dksVZl~ ,DV 1971 dfFkr voeukuk ds ,d o"kZ dh vof/k lekIr gksus ds ipkr~ voekuuk djus okys O;fDr ds fo:} voekuuk ;kfpdk lafLFkr ugh dh tk ldrh gSA bl izdj.k es dfFkr voeukuk gq;s rhu o"kZ ls vf/kd dh le;kof/k chr pqdh gSA bl lEcU/k esa vkjvkjVh 1998 ist 225 esa dgk x;k gS fd & Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Section 20 - Proceedings for contempt cannot be initiated after expiry of a period of one year from date on which contempt is alleged to have been committed. bl izdj.k vkjvkjMh 1989 ist 771 es dgk x;k gS fd & Contempt of Courts Act, Section 20 - High Court cannot be approached after the expiry of one year from the date contempt was committed. (Para 5) 7- mijksDr leLr rF;ksa ,oa dkuwuh izko/kkuksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq;s ;g dUVsEiV izkFkZuk i= [kkfjt fd;k tkrk gSA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA[ 2006 DIGILAW 887 (RAJ) · digilaw.ai ]