Order When this case was taken up, Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there are some typographical mistakes in paragraphs 2, 5, 6 and 11 of the writ petition, which are •of minor in nature and therefore he may be permitted to correct the same. 2. Prayer is allowed. Mr. Jitendra S. Singh is permitted to correct the typographical error. 3. Mr. Singh submitted that the points involved in this case is exactly similar to that in W.P.(Cr.) No. 261 of 2005 which has been allowed and the prosecution has been quashed against the other coaccused Amarendra Tiwari and Shankar Ghosh. Against the present petitioner, the allegation is that the co-accused Arup Kumar Ghosh stated that he used to purchase country made liquor in pouches from the petitioner and then he used to sell the same to the customers of his hotel. 4. The petitioner appears to be licensee and retail dealer of country made liquor as it appears from the receipt showing deposit of license fee on 26.3.2003. 5. Learned G.P.-II does not dispute this fact that the order passed in W.P(Cr.) No. 261 of 2005 shall also be applicable and govern this case also. 6. Accordingly, this application is allowed in terms of the order dated 21.7.2006 passed in W.P(Cr.) No. 261 of 2005 and the entire criminal proceedings against the petitioner in Jamtara (Mihijam) PS. Case No. 122/2003 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 253/03 and the order dated 30.9.2003 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara whereby, the cognizance for the offence under Section 47(A) of the Bihar Excise Act was taken against the petitioner, are hereby quashed.