Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2006 DIGILAW 95 (SC)

Raj Kumar alias Raju Yadav alias Raj Kumar Yadav v. State Of Bihar

2006-01-30

ASHOK BHAN, TARUN CHATTERJEE

body2006
ORDER 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant was, inter alia, charged for commission of the offence under Section 376 IPC. The trial court convicted the appellant under Section 376 IPC and sentenced him to undergo 7 years’ rigorous imprisonment. In appeal, the High Court affirmed the conviction and sentence awarded to the appellant. The appellant approached this Court by filing the special leave petition, which came up for hearing on 7-10-2005, when this Court issued notice limited to the question of sentence. 3. Heard the counsel appearing for the appellant as well as for the respondent State. 4. It is stated that the appellant has already undergone approximately three-and-a-half years incarceration. 5. Keeping in view the fact that there was a delay of three days in lodging the FIR and the fact that the doctor (PW 6), who examined the victim, in her testimony has deposed that she did not find any confirmatory evidence of rape on the victim, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, we deem it appropriate to reduce the sentence awarded to the appellant to the period already undergone. Ordered accordingly. 6. The appellant be released forthwith if not required in any other case. The appeal stands disposed of accordingly. Appeal disposed of accordingly. ***************