Research › Search › Judgment

Jharkhand High Court · body

2006 DIGILAW 986 (JHR)

Arvind Kumar Agarwal v. State of Jharkhand

2006-08-01

AMARESHWAR SAHAY

body2006
Order Heard the parties. 2. The main grievance of the petitioner in this writ application is that on an unauthorized report of the Block Supply Officer, Lohardaga, an F.I.R. was registered against the petitioner who is the owner of a Petrol Pump and against his employees Bihari Prasad, the Manager of the said petrol pump and the Salesman under section 420 IPC and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act for the alleged adulteration in Diesal and Petrol. It is alleged by the petitioner that the petrol pump of the petitioner has forcibly been sealed by the respondents without any lawful reason. 3. According to the petitioner, he is doing the business of petrol in the name of M/s Arvind Automobiles situated at Patra Toli, Lohardaga on valid license. On 21.9.2005, the Block Supply Officer, Lohardaga came in the petrol pump of the petitioner and inspected the premises and during inspection he took 1/2 litre of diesel and petrol on the ground that he had received complaint that the petitioner was selling adulterated diesel and petrol. He also inspected the stock register and other documents and also seized the some of them. The FIR was registered under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and Section 420 I.P.C. against the petitioner (owner), Manager and the Salesman of the petrol pump. He, after making search and seizure, sealed the petrol pump of the petitioner. 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that adulteration of diesel and petrol is not an offence under the Essential Commodities Act and, therefore, lodging of the FIR for the said offence was bad. Even Section 420 IPC was not attracted on the basis of the allegations made in the FIR because no person had made any complaint in that regard. It is further submitted by the petitioner that the offence alleged at best can come under the purview of Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel Order. 1998 and in view of Clause-4 of the said Order the Block Supply Officer is not authorized to make search and seizure of the petrol pump of the petitioner and he had no jurisdiction to seal the petrol pump. 5. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5. 1998 and in view of Clause-4 of the said Order the Block Supply Officer is not authorized to make search and seizure of the petrol pump of the petitioner and he had no jurisdiction to seal the petrol pump. 5. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 2 to 5. It is stated in the counter affidavit that on receipt the direction of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Lohardaga, the informant Block Supply Officer inspected the premises of the petitioner's petrol pump since he had received complaint about the adulteration in diesel and petrol by the petitioner in his petrol pump and, therefore, the petrol pump of the petitioner was inspected and the samples of diesel and petrol were taken for chemical examination and, therefore, there was no illegality in lodging the FIR against the petitioner for the alleged offences. 6. It appears that the case is still pending for investigation and up till now the final form has not been submitted. 7. Considering the fact that the petrol pump .of the petitioner is closed for more than a year causing serious loss to him and it must be also causing inconvenience to the general public and, therefore., this application is being disposed of with a direction to the informant to take all possible steps to get the samples of diesel and petrol, already taken from the petrol pump of the petitioner, chemically examined by the competent authority as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two months from the date of receipt production of a copy of this order if not already done. Since the allegations are serious and it requires investigation and as such, no such relief as prayed for by the petitioner can be granted at this stage. If so advised, the petitioner may file an application before an appropriate forum after the report of the Chemical Analyst is submitted. With these observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of.