( 1 ) HEARD. ( 2 ) THIS petition under section 482 Cr. P. C. has been filed against the order dated 20. 1. 87 passed in a complaint case by 2nd Addl. Munsif Magistrate whereby he summoned the petitioner for offence under section 323/504/506 I. P. C. ( 3 ) THE contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no list of witnesses was submitted by the complainant in the Court below; that no evidence u/s 202 Cr. P. C. was recorded by the trial court and that the alleged offence is a cognizable offence but the complainant made no effort to lodge the F. I. R. The copy of the complaint filed by the petitioner is Annexure ( 4 ) IT contains the list of witnesses. Thereafter there arises no need to file any separate list of witnesses. There is no mention in the petition at all that no evidence under section 202 Cr. P. C. was recorded by the Magistrate. The petitioners counsel was given more than ample time to point out the para of the petition wherein the petitioner stated that no evidence u/s 202 Cr. P. C. was recorded by the Magistrate, but he failed to convince me on this point. The petitioner cannot go beyond the contents of his petition. ( 5 ) IT is stated in the complaint itself that the matter was reported to the police and the injuries were examined by the doctor but when the police took no action the complaint was being filed. Thus none of the arguments made by the petitioners counsel find support from the record, hence these are rejected. ( 6 ) THE applicants counsel further stated that the petitioner was the tenant of a shop and opposite party no. 2 was its landlord; that the civil court granted an injunction in favour of the petitioner restraining the opposite party no. 2 from interfering in the petitioners possession of the shop; that the appeal filed by opposite party no. 2 was dismissed by civil appellate court hence the complaint was filed on false allegations. ( 7 ) THE convincing material in the complaint is that the complainant stated in the complaint that he sustained injury which was examined by the doctor. Thus the material before the Magistrate was convincing and sufficient. 2 was dismissed by civil appellate court hence the complaint was filed on false allegations. ( 7 ) THE convincing material in the complaint is that the complainant stated in the complaint that he sustained injury which was examined by the doctor. Thus the material before the Magistrate was convincing and sufficient. There appears no infirmity in the impugned order which may warrant the interference in the impugned order. The petition lacks merit hence is dismissed. The petitioner is a lady hence it is desired that if she puts in her appearance in the court below within a month and applies for bail, her bail application be disposed of same day. In case her bail is rejected by the trial court she will be released on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 40,000/- for the period till the disposal of her bail application by the Sessions Judge. .