JUDGMENT 1. - The present criminal revision petition under Section 397 Cr.P.C. is preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 24.09.99 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate. Nasirabad in Complaint Case No. 563/91 by which the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. has been partly allowed. 2. Vide impugned order dated 24.09.99, the documents submitted by the complainant are permitted to be taken on record but to prove these documents the witness of the complainant has not been permitted. The documents which are taken on record are notices, postal receipts, acknowledgment card issued by the postal department etc. which were required to be proved and for proving these documents the complainant is required to be re-examined. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and after carefully going through the impugned order dated 24.09.99, since the documents are allowed to be taken on record but for proving the same the complainant is not allowed to re-examine, therefore, in the interest of justice, I deem it proper to quash and set-aside the impugned order dated 24.09.99 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nasirabad to the extent of not allowing reexamination of the complainant and remit the matter back to the Court below for reconsideration on this aspect after hearing the parties and shall pass fresh order to this effect whether re-examination of the complainant is essentially required for disposal of the case or not? 4. With these observations, the revision petition stands disposed of.Revision allowed. *******