Satya Prakash Pathak, J.— I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order. 2. The contention of learned counsel is that in the dying declaration the deceased has stated that she caught fire while preparing meal. His submission is that even while the deceased was under treatment, she disclosed that she caught fire herself. His next submission is that after 10 years of marriage, the incident has occurred, therefore, it cannot be said that it is a case under Sec. 498-A or 306 IPC. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 4. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Kishan Singh S/o Ranjeet Singh by caste Rajput shall be released on bail in FIR No. 102/2006 P.S. Sojat Road, Distt. Pali provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. * * * * *