Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2007 DIGILAW 115 (SC)

Anil Sharma v. State of Haryana

2007-01-24

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, H.K.SEMA

body2007
ORDER : 1. All the intervention/impleadment applications are allowed. 2. Counsel for the petitioner shall file a detailed synopsis (chart) to show as under what Section of law the respondents were convicted, on which date and when they were released on premature and what are the sentences undergone by them. 3. Counsel for the petitioner is allowed to file within four weeks an impleadment application in respect of those persons who have been released prematurely. 4. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 31/10/2006, seven States, viz. Bihar, Gujarat, Manipur, West Bengal, Kerala, Sikkim and NCT of Delhi have filed response. Counsel for the State of Maharashtra submits that the counter of State of Maharashtra will be finalised within seven days. Rest of the States who have not filed response pursuant to our order dated 31/10/2006 shall do so within eight weeks. In the event of any State defaulted in filing counter within eight weeks the State Home Secretary shall be personally present before this Court on the next date of hearing. 5. We have also issued notice in Crl.M.P. No. 9793/2005 on 09/12/2005. No response has been filed by any State till date. The respective States shall also file counter within eight weeks. Contention has been raised by the States' counsel that no copy of Crl.M.P. has been served on them. Counsel for the petitioner shall make available application to all the State counsel within one week. 6. List after eight weeks.