Judgment :- This writ petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the third respondent dated 9. 2005, by which the petitioners contract of service was put an end. 2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, based on certain allegations, the petitioners service contract has been terminated. But, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, this order has been issued without any notice and without giving any opportunity to the petitioner. As such, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, this order has been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. 3. The learned counsel for the respondents also admitted that the impugned order has been passed without providing any opportunity to the petitioner. 4. In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents that the impugned order has been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order passed by the third respondent dated 9. 2005 is set aside. The respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner into service. However, the respondents are at liberty to proceed with the disciplinary proceedings by providing reasonable opportunity to him and pass orders in accordance with law.