Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2007 DIGILAW 1186 (RAJ)

MANJU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

2007-06-06

GUMAN SINGH

body2007
Judgment GUMAN SINGH, V. J. ( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the accused-petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material/case diary made available to me during the arguments of the case. ( 2 ) LEARNED counsel for the accused-petitioners has submitted that the F. I. R. was lodged by the father of the accused against the present accused-petitioners, who are his son and daughter-in-law, in which it was alleged that they had stolen the grain (Channa) from his field. He has also argued that as it revealed from the order of the lower Court two bags were recovered at the instance of Manjeet Singh. He has further argued that the co-accused eight in number were also arrested in the matter and they have already been released by the Lower court under Section 437, Cr. P. C. , therefore, the present accused-petitioners may also be given the benefit of anticipatory bail. ( 3 ) LEARNED Public Prosecutor for the state does not dispute the aforesaid factual position of the case. ( 4 ) TAKING into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, i allow this bail application under Section 438 Cr. P. C. ( 5 ) THEREFORE, the SHO/i. O. of the Police station Sadar District Jhunjhunu, is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-petitioners namely, Manju wife of rajendra and Rajendra Singh son of ragunath in FIR No. 90/2007 registered for the offence under Sections 447, 149 and 379, i. P. C. he shall enlarge them on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand Only)with one surety of the like amount to his satisfaction on the following conditions :- (i) He/she/they shall make himself/herself/themselves available for interrogation by Investigating officer as and when required; (ii) He/she/they shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer. (iii) He/she/they shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. Bail application allowed.