MkW- ijeskpUnz] v/;{k-&;g f}rh; vihy vUrxZr /kkjk 224 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dgk tkosxk½ fo:) fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] t;iqj fnukad 21-2-2002 ds izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd oknh Lo- cnzhukjk;.k us Lo- dY;k.k o ljdkj ds fo:) fnukad 17-8-1976 dks ,d jktLo okn vUrxZr /kkjk 88 o 188 ^vf/kfu;e 1955* bl dFku ds lkFk izLrqr fd;k fd xzke [ksM+h xksdqyiqj rglhy lkaxkusj ftyk t;iqj fLFkfr vkjkth [kljk uEcj 46 jdck 5 ch?kk 3 fcLok ,oa vkjkth [kljk uEcj 69 jdck 1 ch?kk 11 fcLok fdrk 2 dqy jdck 6 ch?kk 13 fcLok Hkwfe ¼ftls rRipkr~ ^fookfnr Hkwfe* ls lacksf/kr fd;k tk,xk½ izfroknh dY;k.k ds ckck }kjk oknh cnzh ds ckck ds ikl 100 o"kZ iwoZ jgu ¼Hkksx ca/kd½ j[kh xbZ gS] ftls izfroknh ds ckck o firk }kjk rFkk Lo;a izfroknh dY;k.k }kjk fof/k fo/kku ds vuqlkj le; ij eqä ugha djkbZ xbZA fygktk mä —f"k Hkwfe dk dkuwuu oknh dkfct [kkrsnkj dkrdkj gks x;kA okn esas dFku fd;k x;k gS fd mä vkjkth dh ckcr~ egdek cankscLr }kjk ckcr~ pdcanh 2008 ls 2023 dh vof/k ds fy, ipkZ [krkSuh Hkh oknh ds cqtqxksZ ds uke ls cuk nh xbZ FkhA Hkwfe nkok nk;jh ds 100 o"kZ ls iwoZ ls oknh o oknh ds iwoZtksa ds dCts dkr esa pyh vk jgh gSA rglhynkj] lkaxkusj us /kkjk 43 ^vf/kfu;e 1955* ds rgr mä vkjkth ,oa lEcfU/kr dkxtkr izfroknh la-1 dks ykSVkus ckcr~ uksfVl nkok nk;jh ds ,d lIrkg iwoZ fn;k x;k] ftlls okn dkj.k mRiUu gksdj okn ?kks"k.kk o LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk dk isk djuk oknh dks vko;d gqvkA okn esa ;g Hkh fy[kk x;k gS fd lakksf/kr /kkjk 43 ^vf/kfu;e 1955* ds izko/kku mä vkjkth dh ckcr~ ykxw ugha gksrs gSA izfroknh dY;k.k dk ^fookfnr Hkwfe* ls dksbZ laca/k ugha jg tkus ds dkj.k oknh dks ^fookfnr Hkwfe* dk dkfct [kkrsnkj dkrdkj ?kksf"kr dj izfroknh dks LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk ls izfrcaf/kr fd;k tkos fd oknh ds dCts dkr esa fdlh izdkj dh n[yankth u djsa] u fdlh vU; ls djk,aA bl izdkj dh nknjlh pkgrs gq, oknh us okn izLrqr fd;kA 3- izfroknh la-1 dY;k.k ls tokcnkok izLrqr djrs gq, okni= dk fojks/k fd;k ,oa dFku fd;k fd izfroknh ds ckck }kjk 100 o"kZ ls tehu oknh ds ckck ds ikl jgu ugha j[kh cfYd mä tehu laor~ 2004 esa j[kh xbZ] tks laor~ 2024 esa jgu eqä gks x;h ,oa u rks oknh ds ckck dks dksbZ vf/kdkj izkIr gq, vkSj u gh oknh dksA t;iqj VhusUlh ,DV ds rgr~ mä jgu 20 o"kksZ esa Hkwfe vius vki jgu eqä gks xbZ vkSj bl rjg ^vf/kfu;e 1955* ds rgr jgu j[kh tehu jkT; ljdkj }kjk jgu eqä dj nh xbZ rfkk mäkuqlkj izfroknh ^fookfnr Hkwfe* dk Lokeh gksdj —"kd gSA oknh fdlh Hkh fof/k vuqlkj Hkwfe dk ekfyd ugha gks ldrkA Hkw izca/k foHkkx }kjk oknh ds uke ls ;fn dksbZ [krkSuh cukbZ xbZ gS rks] xSj dkuwuh ,oa voS/k gSA oknh us tehu ij uktk;t rkSj ij dCtk djus dh uh;r cuk j[kh gSA Hkwfe esa oknh dk dksbZ vf/kdkj izkIr ugha gS] D;ksafd rFkkdfFkr jgu t;iqj fVusUlh ,DV ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj jgu dh vof/k lekIr gksus ls vius vki jgu eqä gks tkrh gS vkSj mldk fQj ls jh-eqä djokuk vko;d ugha jgrk] ftlls Hkwfe esa oknh dks dksbZ vf/kdkj izkIr ugha gksrsA Hkwfe ds leLr vf/kdkj izfroknh la[;k 1 ds gS rFkk fuosnu fd;k fd oknh dk nkok [kkfjt fd;k tkosA 4- jkT; ljdkj dh vksj ls tokcnkok izLrqr dj dFku fd;k x;k fd tekcanh esa dY;k.k dkSe vghj jkfgu cnzhukjk;.k iq= fxj/kkjh nsg eqrZghu vafdr gS rFkk oknh oknxzLr Hkwfe ij /kkjk 43 ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dk mYya?ku dj uktk;t :i ls dCtk j[kuk pkgrk gSA vr% fuosnu fd;k fd nkok oknh [kkfjt fd;k tkosA 5- nkSjkus okn lSVyesaV dk;Zokgh gksus ds QyLo:i fookfnr Hkwfe ds uEcj ifjofrZr gks tkus ds dkj.k oknh i{k dh izkFkZuk i= ij nkos esa uohu uEcjku~ dk vadu fd;k x;kA fygktk vkjkth lkfcdk [kljk uEcj 46 jdck 5 ch?kk 3 fcLok ds gky uEcj 69 jdck 0-81 gSDVj rFkk [kljk uEcj 70 jdck 0-57 gSDVj o lkfcdk [kljk uEcj 69 jdck 1 ch?kk 11 fcLok ds gky uEcj 103 jdck 0-42 gSDVj okn esa ntZ dj lakksf/kr okn fnukad 3-11-2000 [TRUNCATED] (2) .................... (3) .................... (4) A usufructuary mortgage of any land made before the commencement of this Act shall, upon the expiry of the period mentioned in the mortgage deed or twenty years from the date of execution thereof, whichever period is less, be deemed to have been satisfied in full without any payment whatsoever by the mortgagor and the mortgage debt shall accordingly be deemed to have been extinguished and thereupon the mortgaged land shall be redeemed and possession thereof shall be delivered to the mortgagor free from all encumbrances. (5) If the mortgagee does not so redeliver the possession of the land mortgaged he shall be deemed to be a trespasser and liable to ejectment in accordance with sub-section (1) of Section 183." 16- mijksä ^^vf/kfu;e 1955** dh /kkjk 43 dh mi/kkjk 4 esa ;g lkQ ntZ gS fd 20 lky [kRe gksus ds ckn ca/kd dk fuokZiu gks tkrk gSA blh /kkjk dh mi/kkjk 3 esa ;g ntZ gS fd ;fn ca/kdnkj dCtk ugha ns rks og vfrØeh le>k tk,xk vkSj /kkjk 183 dh mi/kkjk ¼1½ [k.M ¼2½ ds vuqlkj mldk fu"dklu fd;k tk ldsxkA pwafd dkuwuh izko/kku ds rgr ca/kdnkj vfrØeh gks tkrk gSA vr% mldk dCtk ca/kddrkZ ds fo:) izfrdwy gks tkrk gS vkSj vuqKs; dCtk ugha jgrkA 17- ^^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 43 dh mi /kkjk 5 ds rgr lu~ 1967 ds rgr oknh vfrØeh gks x;k vkSj mldk izfrdwy dCtk izkjEHk gks x;kA lakksf/kr /kkjk 43 dh mi /kkjk ¼5½ tks jkt- v/;knsk 7 lu~ 1978 }kjk 12-7-78 ls izfrLFkkfir fd;k x;k] mlesa Hkh vfrØeh ekukA mldk lEcfU/kr mi/kkjk bl izdkj gS%& ^^¼5½ ;fn ca/kdnkj ca/kfdr Hkwfe dk dCtk mä :i ls iqu% ifjnÙk ugha djs rks og /kkjk 183-d ds vuqlkj csn[kyh ds fy, nk;h gksxk vkSj bldk mi/kkjk ¼4M+½ ds vUrfoZ"V mica/kksa ij dksbZ izfrdwy izHkko ugha iM+sxkA** xksiky cuke enuyky vkj-vkj-Mh- 1972 i`"B 29 esa ;g fu.kZ; iznku fd;k gS%& "Suit, held governed by provisions of Sec. 43(2) — Sec. 43 amended on 5.4.61 and provisions, made applicable to mortgages, entered into before commencement of R.T. Act — Immediately after amendment, land stood redeemed without any payment since no period mentioned in mortgage deed — Relationship of mortgagor and mortgage ended on 5.4.61 and mortgagee deemed a trespasser u/s. 43(3)." 18- tgk¡ rd bZojnkl cuke lksguyky ,-vkbZ-vkj- 2000 ,l-lh- 426 U;kf;d n`"VkUr] ftlesa vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS%& "E: Mortgage — Estoppel against mortgagee — Plea of Adverse possession — Usufructuary mortgagee cannot deny title of his mortgagor nor can he set up adverse possession unless he actually leaves holding and re-enters in a different status." mi;qZä fl)kUr izuxr izdj.k ij ykxw ugha gksrkA bZojnkl dk izdj.k lEifÙk vUrj.k vf/kfu;e] 1982 ls lacaf/kr izdjk gs rFkk ^,d ckj ca/kd lnSo ca/kd* okyk fl)kUr ^vf/kfu;e 1955* ij ykxw ugha gksrkA blh izdkj t;uanu cuke mejko [kksjh ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1929 bykgckn ist 305] Jh jke cuke Bkdqj nku cgknqj flag ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1965 bykgckn ist 223] LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku cuke gjQwyflag ,-vkbZ-vkj- 2000 ,l-lh- ist 460] jktsUnzflag cuke nychj flag ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1998 fgekpy iznsk ist 43] x;kizlkn fnf{kr cuke Mk- fueZypan 1984 ,l-lh- 930] tgwj bLyke cuke vCnqy deky ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1991 dydÙkk ist 132] izseuan cuke Jhefr jtu pdZorhZ ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1976 dydÙkk ist 55] vcwcsdj c)wy cuek g:.kvnqy 1995¼3½ lh-lh-lh- ist 547 mi;qZä foospuk ds ifjizs{; esa izuxr izdj.k ij rF;ksa ls fHkUu gksus ds dkj.k pLik ugha gksrsA 19- oknh }kjk isk fd;s gq, nkos ds iSjk 4 esa ;g ntZ fd;k gS ^^;g fd mä vkjkth iw.kZ :i ls izkFkhZ oknh o mlds iwoZtksa ds dCts dkr esa pyh vk jgh gS o og gh mä vkjkth dk ckdk;nk yxku vkfn tek djokrs jgs gSaA bl iSjk 4 ds tokc esa izfroknh us muds tokc esa fuEufyf[kr tokc isk fd;k ^^;g fd okn i= dk en ua-4 xyr gksdj vLohdkj gS oknh us mä vkjkth ij uktk;t rkSj ij dCtk djus dh fu;r cuk j[kh gS ftl ckcr~ iqfyl esa mlds f[kykQ rglhy dh vksj ls ,oa izkFkhZ dh vksj dk;Zokgh djuk gSA** bl tokc esa izfroknh us oknh ds izk[;ku ¼assertion½ dh oks yxku tek djkrk vk jgk gS] ds lEcU/k esa dksbZ tokc ugha fn;k gSA tokc nkos dk iSjk ua-6 bl izdkj gS ^^;g fd okn dk en ua-6 xyr gksdj vLohdkj gS mijksä vkjkth;kr ckcr~ jktLFkku —f"k vf/kfu;e dh lakksf/kr /kkjk 43 ds izko/kku ykxw gksrs gSA vkSj mlds rgr ^^oknh ds f[kykQ csn[kyh dh dk;Zokgh mfpr o dkuwuh rkSj ij lgh <ax ls dh tk jgh gS oknh dks vfrØeh ekuus dk loky gh iSnk ugha gksrk gSA mä vkjkth;kr jgu eqä gks pqdh gS fQj mldks fjeqä djokuk vko;d ugha gksrkA** 20- oknh ds nkok isk djus ls igys rglhynkj lkaxkusj us rkjh[k 14-7-1976 dks bl vkk; dk uksfVl fn;k fd jgu NwV tkus ds ckn Hkh oknh us izfroknh dks u rks jgu ds dkxtkr vkSj u tehu dk dCtk gh lqiqnZ fd;k gS vr% oks 15 fnu esa dj nsosa] ojuk muds f[kykQ QkStnkjh eqdíek pykus dh dk;Zokgh dh tk,xhA 21- tgk¡ rd ekSf[kd kgknr dk lEcU/k gs nksuksa gh i{kdkjksa ds xokgksa us ftldh rjQ vFkkZr~ oknh ds xokgku~ us oknh dk dctk crk;k ,oa izfroknh ds xokgku~ us tokcnkok dh dye la[;k 4 o 6 esa dCtk Lo;a dk ugha gksuk ekuk gSA ,slh gkyr esa izfroknh ds xokgku~ }kjk izfroknh dk dCtk crkus dk tks kiFk ij c;ku fn;k feF;k lkfcr gks tkrs gSa ,oa tokc ds dye la-6 esa izfroknh us ;g dFku fd;k fd ^^oknh ds f[kykQ csn[kyh dh dk;Zokgh mfpr o dkuwuh rkSj ij lgh <ax ls dh tk jgh gS** exj ,slh dksbZ dk;Zokgh csn[kyh dh gks] izfroknh us lcwr isk ugha fd;k gS] ftlls ;gh lkfcr gksrk gS fd okn nk;jh dh fnukad dks Hkh izfroknh dk gh dCtk Fkka ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us Thiru John vs. The Returning Officer and others ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1977 ,l-lh- 1724 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "It is well settled that a partys admission as defined in Secs. 17 to 20 fulfilling the requirements of Section 21, Evidence Act, is substantive evidence proprio vigore. An admission, if clearly and unequivocally made, is the best evidence against the party making it and though not conclusive, shifts the onuson to the maker on the principle that "what a party himself admits to be true may reasonably be presumption to be so and until the presumption was rebutted the fact admitted must be taken to be established." 22- izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; us rglhynkj ds fn;s gq, uksfVl o izfroknh }kjk muds tokc nkos ds iSjk ua- 6 esa fy[kh bckjr dks utjvankt fd;k gSA tokc nkos ds iSjk ua- 6 esa fn;s gq, ,Mehku o rglhynkjth ds fn;s gq, uksfVl iznkZ 2 dks i<+us ls ;g fufoZokn lkfcr gksrk gS fd oknh dk dCtk nkok djus ds igys ^fookfnr Hkwfe* ij FkkA vfHkys[k ij ,slh dksbZ kgknr ugha gS] ftlls ;g lkfcr gks fd jgu ckxqtkLr gksus ds ckn izfroknh us oknh ls veqd fnukad dks ^fookfnr Hkwfe* dk HkkSfrd dCtk izkIr fd;kA ¼2001½ 2 ,l-lh-lh- 498 cky—".k cuke lR;izdkk ,.M vnlZ esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd %& "In spite of the order of the Tehsildar against the appellant which was not acted upon, nor executed, the appellant continued in possession of the suit land and, therefore, the continuity of his possession of the suit land was neither interrupted nor lost. Mere passing of an order of ejectment against a person claiming to be in adverse possession neither causes his dispossession nor discontinuation of his possession which alone breaks the continuity of possession." 23- vfHkys[k ij ,slh dksbZ kgknr ugha gS] ftlls ;g lkfcr gks fd laor~ 2024 ds ckn izfroknh us oknh ds f[kykQ ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 183 ds [k.M 3 vFkok lu~ 1978 ds ckn ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 183¼d½ ds rgr dksbZ dk;Zokgh dh gksA mijksä kgknr dh foospuk ls ge bl fu"d"kZ ij igqaprs gS fd nkok djus ds iwoZ ^fookfnr Hkwfe* ij oknh dk dCtk Fkk vkSj ;g dCtk vfrØeh dh gSfl;r ls FkkA fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 31-3-2001 rd Hkh oknh dk vfrØeh dh gSfl;r ls gh dCtk jgk vkSj vkt Hkh ^fookfnr Hkwfe* ij oknh dk dCtk gSA tks izfroknh ds fo:) izfrdwy dCts ds vUrxZr vkrk gSA cXxk cuke lqjsUnz flag 1991 vkj-vkj-Mh- i`"B 01 esa jktLo e.My dh o`g) ihB us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "It is not correct to say that the Indian Limitation Act does not apply to revenue or tenancy matters — The general law of limitation is applicable to proceedings under the tenancy law subject to provisions of Section 214(1)(2) of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act — Application of Section 27 of the Limitation Act is not excluded and khatedari rights can be acquired by adverse possession. A suit can be filed u/s. 88 for the declaration of khatedari rights on the basis of adverse possession — The view taken in 1990 RRD 212 is erroneous — The view taken in 1977 RRD 479 and 1985 RRD 567 is also not entirely correct — The correct law is that by adverse possession, the trespasser acquires khatedari rights provided that the acquisition of khatedari is not specifically prohibited by law, e.g. Section 42 and Section 16 of Rajasthan Tenancy Act." mijksä U;kf;d n`"Vkar ds fo:) jktLo e.My esa utjlkuh izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k] ftlesa [k.MihB us vkj-vkj-Mh- 1992 i`"B 66 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "To conclude, our opinion is that a trespasser can acquire khatedari rights by adverse possession as against the khatedar after the expiry of the period of limitation available to the khatedar in all cases other than cases falling under Section 16 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act. In such circumstances also the State Government shall have a right to eject the trespasser within the period of limitation applicable to the suits or applications filed in that behalf by the State Government. Jhyky ,.M ,unj cuke izHkq ,.M ,unj vkj-vkj-lh- 1993 i`"B 45 esa jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd %& "Both the courts below have come to a concurrent finding that the land is still in possession of the plaintiff and in such circumstances it is clear position that the possession of the plaintiff which become adverse on the date of the expiry of the mortgage or which was adverse right on the first day of possession in his capacity as rank trespasser or perfected because of the expiry of the period of limitation for a suit for possession." blh dsl esa jktLo e.My us iSjk ua-11 esa fuEufyf[kr lEizs"k.k fn;s gS%& "Even otherwise if the merits of the arguments are examined we may say that Rajasthan Tenancy Act nowhere forbids acquisition of Khatedari rights by adverse possession. It is different thing to say that the specific provision of law has been ignored and it is a different thing that there is no provision in law for coming to a particular conclusion in respect of particular right. The source of law include judicial decision and the precedent laid down by the courts in respect of certain principle. When Rajasthan Tenancy Act does not forbid acquisition of Khatedari rights by an adverse possession and when there is no provision regarding the khatedari right in respect of those tenants where these rights are extinguished under Section 63(4) in view of the law of limitation in other words when the khatedari rights are extinguished under Section 63(4) they must repose in some other person khatedari rights will not remain in medio. Madhya Pradesh Tenancy Law specifically lays down that khatedari rights can be accrued by adverse possession and therefore the principle that a person can acquire khatedari rights by adverse possession is not in our opinion unknown to the legal word. Madhya Pradesh Tenancy Law specifically lays down that khatedari rights can be accrued by adverse possession and therefore the principle that a person can acquire khatedari rights by adverse possession is not in our opinion unknown to the legal word. We are therefore of the opinion that the Larger Bench has correctly laid down the law." 24- tSlk fd ge igys gh bl fu"d"kZ ij igqaps gS fd laor~ 2004 ls oknh ds cqtqxksZ ds oä ls oknh dk fujUrj fooknxzLr tehu ij dCtk pyrk vk jgk gSA vr% ifjlhek fudy tkus ds ckn vc nok djds Hkh ^fookfnr Hkwfe* ij dCtk izkIr ugha dj ldrsa ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 63¼iv½ esa izko/kku gS%& "63. Tenancy when extinguished.—(IV). Tenancy when extinguished.—(IV). When he has been deprived of possession and his right to recover possession is barred by limitation." ifjlhek vf/kfu;e] 1963 dh /kkjk 27 bl izdkj gS%& ^^27- lEifÙk ij ds vf/kdkj dk fuokZfir gksuk& ml dkykof/k ds i;kZolku ij] tks fdlh lEifÙk ds dCts dk okn lafLFkr fd, tkus ds fufeÙk fdlh O;fä ds fy, ,rn~}kjk ifjlhfer gS] ,slh lEifÙk ij mldk vf/kdkj fuokZfir gks tk,xkA** 25- U;k;ky; ds fy, ;g vko;d gS fd og eqdíesackth dks de djs vkSj mlds fy, ;fn eqdíesa ds pyus ds nkSjku dkuwu cny tk;s ;k okd;kr~ cny tk;s rks mldk uksfVl ysdj fu.kZ; iznku djsA Jherh ikuh cuke dkUgk vkj-vkj-Mh- 1984 i`"B 88 esa jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB us ;g fu.kZ; iznku fd;k gS%& "Subsequent Events — Notice of — Cause of action in suit for redemption not matured at time of filing of suit but matured during pendency of suit — The Court would take notice of subsequent events and grant such relief as could be granted — Deficiency in cause of action, cured by later events." 26- lEor~ 2004 esa oknh vfrØeh gqvk ,oa laor~ 2024 ls 12 o"kZ ;kfu laor~ 2036 rd izfroknh us oknh ds fo:) ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 183 ds rgr dCtk ysus dk okn ugha fd;kA vr% izfroknh ds [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj ^fookfnr Hkwfe* ds lEca/k esa ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 63¼iv½ ds rgr lekIr gks x, rFkk og csn[kyh ds fy, nkok ugha yk ldrk ,oa uk gh izfroknh us ,slk nkok ;k dkÅ.Vj okn isk fd;k gSA jktLo e.My dh [k.MihB us Nxuk cuke jRuk vkj-vkj-Mh- 1977 i`"B 479 esa iSjk 4 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "As regards the claim of Ratna being a member of Scheduled Tribe, it was pointed out that the provision for declaring a sale by a member of the Schedule tribe to a non-member of such tribe as void was incorporated only with effect from 1.5.64. Even the restriction against such sale was incorporated only on 22.9.56. Ratna sold his land after 22.9.56, but at that time the sale has not become void ab initio and the right of the seller was there to apply for recovery of possession. Similarly the State had also the right to proceed against the irregular purchaser under Section 175 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act. Ratna sold his land after 22.9.56, but at that time the sale has not become void ab initio and the right of the seller was there to apply for recovery of possession. Similarly the State had also the right to proceed against the irregular purchaser under Section 175 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act. Both these remedies had not been availed of by Ratna or the State and as such after the expiry of a period of 12 years from the date of sale by Ratna namely 17.5.57, no remedy was left with Ratna or the State to recover possession from the present appellant. Both these remedies had not been availed of by Ratna or the State and as such after the expiry of a period of 12 years from the date of sale by Ratna namely 17.5.57, no remedy was left with Ratna or the State to recover possession from the present appellant. In this view of the matter, it was argued that there was no point in remanding the case back to the trial Court because no further evidence was likely to be adduced and all the relevant documents namely the registered sale-deeds were already there on the record." ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us Hkwfj;k eksfx;k ,.M vnlZ cuke lrhk ixkfj;k ,.M vnlZ ¼2001½ 9 ,l-lh-lh- 385 ,oa ekaxhyky cuke LVsV vkWQ jktLFkku vkj-vkj-Vh- 2003 i`"B 331 esa jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; dh [k.MihB us dgk fd ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 209 dk iz;ksx dj U;k;ky; mfpr le>s] og vuqrks"k iznku dj ldrk gSA [k.MihB ds kCnksa esa & "The Prayer for alternative relief sought to be made in the suit cannot be said to displace the case of defendant or to cause any prejudice to him and more particularly when the trial Court can grant then relief which the court is competent to grant and to which it must find the plaintiff entitled notwithstanding that such relied may not have Act, them under the circumstances allowing the amendment would not prejudice the case of the defendant." 27- mi;qZä fl)kUr dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, pwafd oknh dks ^fookfnr Hkwfe* ls] tks fd mlds dCts esa gS] ls dkuwu dh lE;d~ izfØ;k viuk, fcuk ugha gVk;k tk ldrk o izfroknh ds [kkrsnkjh vf/kdkj ^fookfnr Hkwfe* ds lEcU/k esa ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 63¼iv½ ds rgr volku gks x,A ,slh fLFkfr esa ;g vko;d gS fd muds i{k esa izfroknh i{k dks LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk ls izfrcfU/kr fd;k tkuk mfpr gksxkA vr% izfroknh fookfnr Hkwfe ls oknh dks tcju csn[ky ugha djsa vkSj muds dCts dkr esa fdlh izdkj dk vuqfpr gLr{ksi ugha djsaA ijh{k.k U;k;ky; }kjk rF;ksa ds ifjizs{; esa fof/kd :i ls oknh dk okn fMØh fd;k x;k gS rFkk izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; dk fu"d"kZ fof/kd izko/kkuksa ds foijhr gksus ls fujLr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA vr% vihy oknh@vihykFkhZ Lohdkj dh tkrh gSA izFke vihyh; U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 21-2-2002 dks fujLr fd;k tkrk gS vkSj fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ; ,oa fMØh fnukad 31-3-2001 dks izfrLFkkfir djrs gq, mldh iqf"V dh tkrh gSA i{kdkj viuk viuk [kpkZ Lo;a ogu djsaA 28- fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA rn~uqlkj fMØh ipkZ tkjh gksaA