Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2007 DIGILAW 1297 (RAJ)

ROODMAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

2007-07-11

GUMAN SINGH

body2007
Judgment GUMAN SINGH, J. ( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant material placed before me. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that quantity of Ganja allegedly recovered from the petitioner is 1. 42 grams, which is less than the minimum quantity under the N. D. P. S. Act, therefore, the accused petitioner should be granted indulgence of bail. ( 2 ) LEARNED P. P. opposed the bail application. ( 3 ) HAVING heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner under Section 439 Cr. P. C. ( 4 ) IN the result, the bail application is allowed and it is, ordered that petitioner Rood mal in FIR No. 210/200 registered at Police station Bansoor, District Alwar, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bail bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. Application allowed.