JUDGMENT Vinod K. Sharma. J. (Oral):- The Cross-objectors have challenged the finding of the learned Courts below on issue No.4 on the plea that the learned Tribunal has not assessed the income of the deceased correctly and wrongly discarded evidence on record showing that the deceased was working as a Driver in Saudi Arabia and, therefore, the assessment of his income as Rs.2000/- p.m. is highly inadequate. It may be noticed that the learned Tribunal has assessed the income of Rs.2000/- for the reason that no documentary evidence was brought on record to show that the deceased was working as driver in Saudi Arabia and having an income of Rs.20,000/- p.m. The learned Tribunal assessed dependency at Rs.1300/- p.m. after deducting 1/3rd after his personal expenses. The procedure adopted by the learned Tribunal cannot be said to be perverse or contrary to law. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that compensation on account of loss of consortium and funeral expenses has also not been given to the claimant-appellants. Be that as it may, the compensation granted is just and adequate which does not call for any interference by this Court. Dismissed. ----------------------------