JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for accused petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the challan papers including the statements of Ghasi (PW1), Dhapu (PW2) who are respectively father and mother of the deceased and other witness Ramniwas (PW 3) and Dr. Keshav (PW 4) and other material placed during the course of arguments. 2. It is contended on behalf of the accused petitioner that Dhapu (PW2) mother of the deceased turned hostile and she categorically denied about any demand of dowry by the accused petitioner and Ghasi (PW1) also denied about any demand of dowry made by the accused petitioner but only stated that he demanded money for his shop which does not come within the purview of demand of dowry. Reliance has been placed on the judgment delivered in the case of Balveer v. State of Rajasthan, reported in 2005 (2) S.C.C. 795 . It is also submitted that nothing has been alleged that deceased wife of the accused petitioner ever complained about any ill treatment by the accused petitioner.Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 3. Without making any observations on merits, having considered the rival submissions made at the bar nature of allegations levelled against the accused petitioner, material placed during the course of arguments, entire facts and circumstances and particularly keeping in view the statements of Ghasi (PW 1) and Dhapu (PW 2), I deem it proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail under section 439 Cr.PC. 4. It is, therefore, ordered that the accused petitioner Ram Prasad S/o Kishan Regar in FIR No. 55/2006 Police Station Datwas be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- together with two surety bonds each in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- to the satisfaction of the learned ed trial court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so during the pendency of the against him.Bail Granted. *******