JUDGMENT 1. - This criminal revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.PC. is directed against the order dated 17.11.2006 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Chirawa district Jhunjhunu in case No. 6/2006 whereby the disputed rooms Nos. 16, 17, 18 including verandah of the Haveli situated in village Bangothari Kalan were attached and SHO Pilani was appointed receiver. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. 3. An order of attachment passed on ground of emergency under Section 146(1) Cr.P.C. during the pendency of the proceedings under Section 145 Cr.P.C. is an order purely of intermediate and temporary nature as by the order of attachment neither the rights of the parties are adjudicated nor any finding about any legal right is given by such an order. The order does not finally dispose of the pending proceedings and as such the order of attachment passed on ground of emergency is an interlocutory order within the meaning of Section 397(2) Cr.P.C. A bare perusal of the impugned order which appears to have been passed under Section 146(1) Cr.PC. makes it clear that it has been passed as a measure of emergency in view of the possibility- of loss of life and property without affecting the legal rights of the parties to the proceedings and, therefore, it is an interlocutory order against which revision is not maintainable under Section 397(2) Cr.P.C. In this regard I refer to a decision of High Court delivered in Sultan Singh v. State of Rajasthan, reported in 2006(2) RLW 885 . 4. Consequently this revision petition stands dismissed.Revision Dismissed. *******