Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2007 DIGILAW 1954 (RAJ)

Gopilal v. Prema

2007-10-08

N.K.JAIN

body2007
tSu] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh vUrxZr /kkjk 230 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ fo:) fu.kZ; jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dksVk fnukad 2-9-2000 isk dh xbZ gSA 2- la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd vizkFkhZ la[;k 1 us ,d okn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 188 ds rgr mi[k.M vf/kdkjh cwanh ds U;k;ky; esa xzke laoj esa fLFkr vkjkth [kljk la[;k 23 feu jdck 2 ch?kk 19 fcLok ckcr~ isk fd;k lkFk gh ,d izkFkZuk i= vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 212 fjlhoj fu;qä djus gsrq isk fd;kA mi[k.M vf/kdkjh us fnukad 12-10-2000 dks fookfnr Hkwfe fjlhojh esa ysus dk vknsk ;k fodYi esa 1500@& :i;s izfr ch?kk izfr o"kZ udn izfrHkwfr tek djokus ij fjlhojh dk vknsk LFkfxr djus dk fu.kZ; fd;kA bl vknsk ds fo:) vizkFkhZx.k us jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dksVk ds le{k vihy isk dh ftUgksaus fnukad 2-9-2002 dks udn izfrHkwfr ckcr~ ikfjr vknsk dks lekIr dj fookfnr Hkwfe dks fjlhojh esa ysus dk vknsk iznku dj fn;k] ftlls O;fFkr gksdj ;g fuxjkuh isk dh xbZ gSA 3- izkFkhZx.k ds vf/koäk us cgl esa crk;k fd fookfnr Hkwfe dk dCtk cspku bdjkjukesa ds vk/kkj ij vizkFkhZ izsek o mlds HkkbZ;ksa us izkFkhZx.k dks lkSaik Fkk ,oa izkFkhZx.k us 28000@& :i;s dk Hkqxrku dj ;g bdjkjukek lEikfnr fd;k Fkk ftl ij vkt Hkh izkFkhZx.k dk dCtk gSA mudk dFku gS fd mi[k.M vf/kdkjh us 1500@& :i;s izfr ch?kk izfr o"kZ izfrHkwfr ds :i esa izkFkhZx.k }kjk tek djkus ij fjlhoj LFkfxr j[kus dk vknsk fn;k Fkk ftlds fo:) jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh ds ;gka izkFkhZx.k us vihy dh ,oa jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh us fookfnr Hkwfe dks buehfM;ksa ekurs gq, Li"V :i ls fjlhojh esa ysus dk fof/k fo:) vknsk ikfjr dj fn;kA mUgksaus ;g Hkh crk;k fd bdjkjukesa dh fØ;kfUofr gsrq izkFkhZx.k us flfoy U;k;ky; esa okn Hkh isk dj j[kk gSA mUgksaus vuqjks/k fd;k fd bl ekeys esa ekSds ij jsdkMZ dh ;FkkfLFkfr j[krs gq, izdj.k dk rhu ekg esa fuLrkj.k djus ds fy, mi[k.M vf/kdkjh cwanh dk izfrizsf"kr fd;k tk,A 4- vizkFkhZ ds vf/koäk us cgl ds mÙkj esa crk;k fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk LisflfQd QjQksjesal ,DV ds vuqlkj dksbZ Hkh okn isk ugha dj j[kk gSA mUgksaus ;g Hkh crk;k fd vizkFkhZ us vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 188 ds rgr okn isk fd;k Fkk lkFk gh izdj.k la[;k 55@89 fnukad 10-10-1990 }kjk vizkFkhZ lfgr rhuksa HkkbZ;ksa esa Hkwfe dk caVokjk fd;k x;kA mudk rdZ gS fd vizkFkhZ us dksbZ cspku ugha fd;k ,oa izkFkhZx.k ds vf/koäk }kjk ftl bdjkjukesa dh ckr dgh tk jgh gS og okns dkxt ij fy[kkoV ek= gS ,oa bl vk/kkj ij izkFkhZx.k dks dksbZ gd ugha feyrk gSA ;g fd rFkkdfFkr bdjkjukesa dk gokyk nsrs gq, izkFkhZx.k vizkFkhZ ls vk;s fnu >xM+k djrs jgrs gS blfy, fookfnr Hkwfe dks fjlhojh esa ysus dk vknsk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us fn;k gS og lehphu gsa mUgksaus vius dFku ds leFkZu esa 2002 vkj-ch-ts- ist 474] 2005 vkj-vkj-Mh- ist 172] 1994 vkj-vkj-Mh- ist 37 o 145] 1995 Mh-,u-ts- ist 15] 1995 vkj-vkj-Mh- ist 321] ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1973 ,l-lh- ist 76 ds U;kf;d n`"VkUr m)fjr djrs gq, dFku fd;k fd nksuksa v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa ds fu.kZ;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, fuxjkuh lkjghu gSA 5- izfrmÙkj esa izkFkhZx.k ds vf/koäk us dFku fd;k fd fnukad 10-10-1990 dh fMØh esa fookfnr Hkwfe vizkFkhZ ds gd esa x;h gS ,oa ,xzhesaV Vw lsy ij vizkFkhZ lfgr mlds rhuksa HkkbZ;ksa ds gLrk{kj gSA mUgksaus 1978 vkj-vkj-Mh- ist 144 ds lanHkZ esa crk;k fd fjlhojh esa ysus ls iwoZ dCtk ns[kk tkuk pkfg, ,oa ;g Hkh fd vizkFkhZ vU; xkao esa fuokl djrk gS ,oa mldk ekSds ij dCtk ugha gSA 6- geus mHk;i{k ds fo}ku vf/koäkvksa dh cgl ij euu fd;k rFkk jsdkMZ dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- i{kdkjksa ds e/; fookfnr Hkwfe dks ysdj vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 188 ds rgr okn fopkjk/khu gSA izkFkhZx.k bl Hkwfe ij ,xzhes.V Vw lsy ds vk/kkj ij viuk dCtk crkrs gS rks nwljh vksj izsek us ;g Hkwfe caVokjs dh fMØh ds }kjk dCtk izkIr djuk vafdr fd;k gSA l{ke U;k;ky; ls fookfnr Hkwfe ds LoRo ds fu/kkZj.k rd ;g Hkwfe buehfM;ksa izrhr gksrh gSA bl izlax esa vizkFkhZ ds vf/koäk }kjk m)fjr U;kf;d n`"VkUr 1994 vkj-vkj-Mh- ist 37 bl ekeys esa iw.kZ laca/k j[krk gSa ftlls ge lger gS og bl izdkj gS %& Rajasthan Tenancy Act, Section 212 and Code of Civil Procedure, Section 151 – Application under Section 212 in cross-suits by both parties – Neither parties produced proof of possession – one party claiming title on the basis of unstamped unregistered sale deed purported to have been executed by the other party while the letter claimed title on basis of co-tenancy – Sub-divisional Officer accepted application of former and issued temporary injunction but rejected latters application – In the circumstances, held land was in medio and the only remedy to protect it was appointment of receiver. vr,o fookfnr Hkwfe ij fjlhoj dk;e djus ds laca/k esa jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dksVk ds vknsk esa dksbZ =qfV izrhr ugha gksrh gSA 8- mijksä foospu ds vk/kkj ij ;g fuxjkuh Bksl vk/kkj ds vHkko esa [kkfjt dh tkrh gS ,oa jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dksVk dk vknsk fnukad 2-9-2002 ;Fkkor~ j[kk tkrk gSA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esas lquk;k x;kA