Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2007 DIGILAW 2086 (RAJ)

Surendra Kumar v. Shanti Bai

2007-10-26

R.S.AGRAWAL

body2007
vxzoky] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh lgk;d dysDVj ¼mi[k.M vf/kdkjh½ cwUnh }kjk izdj.k la[;k 27@2000 esa ikfjr vknsk fnukad 4-5-2002 ds fo:) jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ dh /kkjk 230 ds vUrxZr izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- bl izdj.k ds la{ksi esa rF; bl izdj ls gSa fd izkFkhZx.k ,oa vizkFkhZx.k ds e/; ,d jktLo okn la- 27@2000 vUrxZr /kkjk 188 vf/kfu;e ckcr~ vkjkth [k-ua- 574@2 jdck 2 ch?kk 13 fcLok] [k-ua- 871@2 jdck 1 fcLok] [k-ua- 1966@1 jdck 20 ch?kk 13 fcLok dqy fdrk 3 dqy jdck 27 ch?kk 7 fcLok okds xzke rhFkZ rglhy o ftyk cwUnh fopkjk/khu gSA mä fopkjk/khu okn esa fo}ku lgk;d dysDVj ¼mi[k.M vf/kdkjh½ cwUnh us vius fuxjk/khu vknsk fnukad 4-5-2002 ls lk{; izfroknh cUn djus dk vknsk ikfjr fd;k gS ftlds fo:) izkFkhZx.k@izfroknhx.k }kjk ;g fuxjkuh e.My esa isk dh x;h gSA 3- izdj.k esa mHk; i{kksa ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k dh cgl lquh xbZA fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vknsk fnukad 4-5-2002 ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA 4- cgl ds nkSjku fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd izkFkhZx.k@izfroknhx.k dk dFku gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; dk fuxjk/khu vknsk fnukad 4-5-2002 U;k;] fu;e ,oa jsdkMz ij miyC/k rF;ksa ds fo:) gksus ls dkfcy fujLruh; gsA fopkj.k U;k;ky; dh i=koyh ls ;g HkyhHkkafr Li"V gs fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk izkFkhZx.k dks lk{kh isk djus gsrq dsoy ek= nks volj fnukad 20-3-2002 ,oa fnukad 16-4-2002 dks fn;s x;s gS ftlesa ,s ,d frFkh fnukad 16-4-2002 dks nks xokgksa fdkuflag o NksVwyky ds c;kj djok;s x;s rFkk ks"k lk{; ds fy, ekSdk pkgk x;k FkkA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vknsk 16 fu;e 1 tkCrk nhokuh ds izko/kkuksa ds foijhr gSA lkekU;r% lk{kh@kgknr i{kdkj }kjk U;k;ky; ds vknskksa dh ikyumk djus mnklhurk cjrus] xaHkhj =qfV djus vFkok izdj.k dks tkucw>dj nsjh djus dh fLFkfr esa gh can dh tkuh pkfg;s fdUrq bl izdj.k esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; us fcuk leqfpr dkj.k lk{; can djrs gq, izkFkhZx.k@izfroknhx.k dks U;k; ls oafpr fd;k gs ftlls mUgsa viw.kZuh; {kfr gksuk laHkkfor gSA vr% mudk fuosnu gS fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr bl fuxjkuh dks Lohdkj fd;k tkdj fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vknsk fnukad 4-5-2002 dks fujLr djrs gq, lk{; izLrqr djus gsrq volj iznku fd;k tkosA 5- cgl ds nkSjku fo}ku vfHkHkk"kd vizkFkhZx.k dk dFku gS fd fopkj.k U;;ky; }kjk ikfjr vknsk Li"V] fof/klEer ,oa fjdkMZ ij miyC/k rF;ksa ij vk/kkfjr gSA izfroknhx.k fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k le; ij lk{kh izLrqr ugha dj izdj.k dks nsjhuk djuk pkgrs gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk leqfpr volj nsus ds ckn Hkh izfroknhx.k lk{kh izLrqr djus esa vlQy jgs gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vknsk iw.kZr;% ;qfä;qä rFkk fof/klEer gS ftlesa fuxjkuh ds Lrj ij gLr{ksi fd;k tkuk mfpr ugha gSA izkFkhZ }kjk izLrqr fuxjkuh lkjghu ,oa dkfcy fujLruh; gSA 6- mHk;i{k ds fo}ku vfHkHkk"kdx.k }kjk cgl esa izLrqr rdksa dk euu fd;k ,oa fjdkMZ dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk fuxjk/khu vknsk fnukad 4-5-2002 ls lk{; izfroknh bl vk/kkj ij can dh gS fd izfroknh dks viuh lk{; isk djus ds iz;kIr volj fnukad 20-3-2002 o 16-4-2002 fn;s tkus ds ckn Hkh lk{; iw.kZ:i ls isk ugha dh xbZ gSA mYys[kuh; gS fd fnukad 16-4-2002 dks fdku flag] NksVw yky nks xokgksa ds c;ku djk;s x;s rFkk ks"k lk{; gsrq ,d volj pkgs tkus ij izdj.k esa vkxkeh frFkh 4-5-2002 j[kh x;h gSA bl frFkh dks izfroknh }kjk lk{; isk uk dj lk{; ds :i esa xksn ds xokg eksgu yky dks isk djus gsrq le; pkgk x;kA gekjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa izdj.k esa fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks U;k;fgr esa izfroknhx.k dks lk{; gsrq mnkj n`f"Vdks.k viukrs gq, ,d vfUre volj nsrs gq, lk{; izLrqr djus gsrq ikcUn djuk pkfg, FkkA bl izdkj ds izdj.kksa esa lkekU;r% mnkj n`f"Vdks.k viukuk mfpr gSa lk{kh izLrqr djus ds laca/k esa i{kdkj dk vkpj.k vR;f/kd mis{kkiw.kZ gksus dh fLFkfr esa lk{; can dh tk ldrh gSA ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; }kjk izdj.k lruke VªkaliksVZ dEiuh cuke izdkk ey lqjk.kk esa ikfjr fu.kZ; ¼1980 vkj-,y-MCY;w- ist 213½ esa fuEu O;oLFkk nh gS % "The provisions contained in Order 16, Rule 1, CPC, should be construed by the Courts liberally. The evidence should not be normally shut unless the conduct of the parties is grossly negligent and there are serious latches on its part. Wrong and unwarranted exercise of discretion gives rise to avoidable litigations in the form of appeals and revisions and setting aside of such orders in appeals and revisions would further result in prolongation of the litigation, thereby the very object of the salutary provisions intended to curb the delays would be defeated. Thus the trial Courts should so exercise their discretion and conduct the lis in such a manner, which may avoid unnecessary litigation and advance substantial justice, unless they are required to adopt a different course, either by force of circumstances, or where their hands are tires by law." 7- mijksä foospu ds QyLo:i izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr ;g fuxjkuh Lohdkj dh tkdj fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr fuxjk/khu vknsk fnukad 4-5-2002 fujLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk izkFkhZx.k@izfroknhx.k dks fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k lk{; izLrqr djus gsrq ,d vfUre volj fn;k tkdj vknsk fn;k tkrk gS fd os fnukad 12-12-2007 dks fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj vius xokg izLrqr djs mä frFkh ij xokg izLrqr ugha fd;s tkus ds ipkr~ dksbZ vksj volj ugh fn;k tk;sxkA i{kdkjku~ fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds le{k fnukad 12-12-2007 mifLFkr gksaosA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA