Judgment , J. 1. This petition seeks quashing of award dated 2.9.2003, Annexure P-5, reinstating the respondent No. 1 workman with 50% backwages from the date of demand notice dated 23.5.1996. Annexure P-1. 2. Case of the workman is that he joined duty on 1.8.1995 and his services were terminated on 4.4.1996 without following any procedure. 3. The management contested the claim by submitting that the workman was had not completed 240 days of service. The Labour Court held that the workman completed 240 days of service. Adverse inference was drawn against the management for not producing the record. 4. This petition has been filed four years after passing of the award. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1, workman puts in appearance and states that the workman stands reinstated, the award stands implemented and the writ petition was highly belated. 5. Since the impugned award has been implemented, as stated by learned counsel for the respondent No. 1. we do not find any ground to interfere with the impugned order. 6. We, however, notice the observations of the Honble Supreme Court in Gangadhar Pillai v. Siemens Ltd., (2007)1 SCC 533 2007(1) SLR 302 (SC] (Tara 28) that the workman on reinstatement gets the same status and does not get the status of regular employee. 7. The petition is disposed of.