JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the relevant documents placed before me. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the allegation against the petitioner is of receiving stolen items for which charge against him has been framed for offences under Sections 411, 414 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code which is punishable by 3 years imprisonment whereas the main accused is Deepu @ Devendra Pratap Singh. The coordinate bench of this Court on consideration of this very aspect while rejecting the bail application of co-accused Illiyas Mohammad has extended the benefit of bail to co-accused Bhooru @ Kareem Beg vide order dated 07.09.2007 in S.B. Cr. Misc. Bail Appl. No. 5035/07 against whom also charges under Sections 411, 414 and 120-B Indian Penal Code were framed. No previous case has ever been registered against the petitioner inasmuch as the challan having already filed and the trial of the case is likely to take long. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and argued that considering the nature of the offence, the petitioner is not entitled to bail. 4. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of this case but taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments aforestated, particularly when the co-accused Bhooru @ Kareem Beg having similar charges has already been enlarged on bail, I deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. In the result, this bail application under section 439 Criminal Procedure Code is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Inamuddin S/o Hafijuddin shall be released on bail in FIR No.50/2007 P.S. Kotwali, Distt. Jhalawar subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before that court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till conclusion of the trial. 6. However, in case, petitioner is found involved in repeating the similar offence at any point of time, the prosecution will be at liberty to apply for cancellation of bail.Application allowed. *******