Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2007 DIGILAW 2173 (RAJ)

Ramniwas v. Murti Mandir Shri Virajman

2007-11-13

N.K.JAIN

body2007
tSu] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh vUrxZr /kkjk 230 jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼la{ksi esa vf/kfu;e½ fo:) jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dksVk fnukad 11-2-2002 isk dh xbZ gSA 2- la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd vizkFkhZ us ,d okn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 183 mi[k.M vf/kdkjh uSuoka ds U;k;ky; esa isk fd;k o lkFk gh fjlhoj fu;qä djus gsrq Hkh vuqjks/k fd;kA mi[k.M vf/kdkjh us vknsk fnukad 27-3-2001 }kjk fookfnr Hkwfe dks fjlhojh esa ysus dk vknsk fn;k ,oa 600@& :i;s izfr ch?kk izfr o"kZ tek djkus ij rkQSalyk fookfnr Hkwfe izkFkhZ ds ikl j[ks tkus dk vknsk fn;kA bl vknsk ds fo:) izkFkhZ us jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dksVk ds ;gka vihy isk dh tks fnukad 11-1-2002 dks [kkfjt dj nh xbZ blls vlarq"V gksdj ;g fuxjkuh isk dh xbZ gSA 3- izkFkhZ dh vksj ls ckotwn lwpuk dksbZ Hkh mifLFkr ugha gq,A vr,o vizkFkhZ ds vf/koäk dh ,drjQk cgl lquh xbZA 4- vizkFkhZ ds vf/koäk us cgl esa crk;k fd vizkFkhZ us izkFkhZ ds fo:) ,d okn vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 183 ds rgr mi[k.M vf/kdkjh uSuoka ds U;k;ky; esa isk fd;k Fkk o lkFk gh fookfnr Hkwfe dks fjlhojh esa ysus gsrq Hkh izkFkZuk i= isk fd;k FkkA mUgksaus vkxz crk;k fd fookfnr Hkwfe eafnj ewfrZ chtklu ekrkth ds uke ij gS ftldk foØ; ugha fd;k tk ldrk gS fdUrq izkFkhZ us iqtkjh ls gq, bdjkjukesa ds vk/kkj ij fookfnr Hkwfe dk Ø; djuk o dCtk gksuk ck;k FkkA mudk rdz gS fd fookfnr Hkwfe dk cspku ugha fd;k tk ldrk ,oa rFkkdfFkr foØ; bdjkjukek fd;k x;k gS go Hkh voS/k gksus ls rkQSlyk fookfnr Hkwfe dks fjlhojh esa ysus dk vknsk mi[k.M vf/kdkjh us fn;k gSA mUgksaus rkQSlyk fookfnr Hkwfe ij 600@& :i;s izfr ch?kk izfr o"kZ udn izfrHkwfr jkfk dks Hkh mfpr crk;kA vUr esa mUgksaus 1995 vkj-vkj-Mh- ist 76] 731 o 732 ds U;kf;d n`"VkUr m)fjr djrs gq, fuxjkuh lkjghu gksus ls [kkfjt djus dk vuqjks/k fd;kA 5- fuxjkuh eheksa ds vuqlkj fookfnr Hkwfe dk bdjkjukesa ds tfj;s Ø; izkFkhZ us fd;k gS ;g bdjkjukek iqtkjh ds }kjk fd;k x;k gS ,oa fookfnr Hkwfe ij izkFkhZ foxr 30 o"kksZ ls dkfct gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa udn izfrHkwfr dh ekax dks vuqfpr crk;kA 6- geus vizkFkhZ ds vf/koäk dh cgl ij euu fd;k o i=koyh rFkk U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dk voyksdu fd;kA 7- jsdkMZ ds vuqlkj fookfnr Hkwfe Jh chtklu ekrkth ds uke ij ntZ gS ftldk vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 76 ds vuqlkj eafnj ewfrZ kkor ukckfyx gksus ls varj.k ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA nwljh vksj izkFkhZ iqtkjh ls gq, bdjkjukesa ds vk/kkj ij fookfnr Hkwfe dks fjlhojh esa ysus o rkQSlyk 600@& :i;s izfr ch?kk izfr o"kZ udn izfrHkwfr nsus ij dCtk izkFkhZ dk cuk;s j[kus gsrq tks vknsk fn;k gS og lehphu izrhr gksrk gS ,oa mls jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh us Hkh ;Fkkor~ j[kk gSA bl laca/k esa ge vizkFkhZ ds vf/koäk }kjk m)fjr U;kf;d n`"VkUr 1995 vkj-vkj-Mh- ist 76 esa ikfjr vfHker ls lger gS tks bl izdkj gS %& Raj. Tenancy Act, 1955, Ss. 212 & 208—CPC, O. 40 R. 1—T.I. application—Cash security for remaining in possession of land in dispute—Whether the Revenue Courts are competent to pass order for cash security inc ases where neither receiver is appointed nor temporary injunction is issued u/s. 212—Held, Yes—Board of Revenue was competent to pass order for cash security even without appointing receiver or without granting T.I.—1979 RRD 294 (D.B.), approved - 1992(1) RLW 592 (D.B.) overruled." blds vuqlkj udn izfrHkwfr ds fy;s fn;k x;k vknsk mfpr gS ,oa vkj-vkj-Mh- 1995 ist 731 o 732 esa ikfjr vfHker ds vk/kkj ij fuxjkuh Bksl vk/kkj ds vHkko esa [kkfjt ;ksX; ik;h tkrh gSA 8- vr,o izLrqr fuxjkuh [kkfjt dh tkrh gS ,oa jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dksVk dk fu.kZ; fnukad 11-2-2002 ;Fkkor~ j[kk tkrk gSA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA