Jheky] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 230 ds vUrxZr lgk;d dysDVj ¼eq[;ky;½] Hkjriqj ds fu.kZ; fnukad 8-12-2000 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS oknhx.k@vizkFkhZx.k ijHkkrh o gsrjke us izfroknh@oknhx.k fot; flag o vU; ds fo:) vf/kfu;e 1955 dh /kkjk 183 ds rgr okLrs dCtk fnykus vkjkth [kljk uEcj 4874 jdck 6 ,s;j okds xzke vtku] rglhy dqEgsj ,-lh-le] Hkjriqj ds U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;kA izdj.k izfroknhx.k dh lk{; esa py jgk FkkA izfroknhx.k ds xokg jktsUnz flag o eaxy flag ckotwn tekurh okj.V ds ryc fd, tkus ij Hkh U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr ugha gq, rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; us muds vknsk fnukad 8-12-2000 }kjk izfroknh dh lk{; cUn dj nhA mä vknsk ls O;fFkr gksdj izkFkhZx.k@izfroknhx.k us izuxr fuxjkuh jktLo e.My jktLFkku] vtesj esa izLrqr dhA 3- i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k dks lquk x;k o muds }kjk izLrqr rdksZ ij euu fd;k x;kA 4- izuxr izdj.k esa U;k;ky; }kjk tekurh okj.V ls ryc djus ds ckotwn Hkh jktsUnz flag o eaxy flag mifLFkr ugha gq,A ,slh fLFkfr esa tgka i{kdkj fdlh O;fä dh lk{; djkuk pkgrk gS vkSj og O;fä lEeu rkehy ds ipkr~ Hkh U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr ugha gksrk gS rks esjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa ;k;ky; dks ,sls i{kdkj dh lgk;rk djuh pkfg, o xokg dh mifLFkfr izofrZr djuh pkfg,A fopkj.k U;k;ky; us izkFkhZx.k dh xokg cUn dj vf/kdkfjrk lEcU/kh =qfV dh gSA eSllZ lksguflag ,.M dEiuh cuke eksgEen ,fkd R;kxh ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1973 fgekpy iznsk 39 esa ekuuh; fgekpy iznsk mPp U;k;ky; us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd %& "Index Note :- (1) Civil P.C. (1908), S. 115 and O. 16, Rr.
10 to 16 and 20 — Failure to exercise jurisdiction — When the Court does not enforce the attendance of the witnesses duly served and closes the defendants evidence it fails to exercise jurisdiction vested in it and is liable to be corrected in revision." lqjsk ukFk eksnh cuke ,y-vklZ- vkWQ tksjkojey] ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1999 jkt- 357 esa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd %& "Civil P.C. (5 of 1908), O. 16, R. 10 — Enforcing attendance of witnesses — Duty of Court — Non-appearance of witnesses in spite of service of summons of them — Order of closure of evidence of petitioner — Plaintiff, not proper — Duty of Court to see that process issued by it is duly served." tkx`fr miHkksäk dY;k.k ifj"kn o vU; cuke ;w-vks-vkbZ- ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1999 ,l-lh- 325 esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd %& "Constitution of India, Art. 32 —Civil P.C. (5 of 1908), O. 16, R. 10 — Practice and procedure — Ensuring attendance in Court — Non-appearance before Court despite order — Effect — Party deliberately avoiding appearance despite Court directions — Thereby taking liberties with Court — Directions given to issue non-bailable warrants to secure presence of party before Court." mi;qZä U;kf;d n`"VkUr ds ifjizs{; esa izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr fuxjkuh Lohdkj dh tkrh gS vkSj lgk;d dysDVj] Hkjriqj }kjk ikfjr vknsk fnukad 8-12-2000 fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA izkFkhZx.k dks funsZk fn, tkrs gS fd og fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa xokg jktsUnz flag o eaxy flag ds lgh irs lfgr uksfVl isk djsa rFkk fopkj.k U;k;ky; mudh mifLFkfr ds fy, fof/k vuqlkj dk;Zokgh dj izdj.k dk xq.kkxq.k ij fuLrkj.k djsaA 6- i{kdkjksa dks funsZk fn, tkrs gS fd os fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa fnukad 27-12-2007 dks mifLFkr gksa] ml jkst v/khuLFk U;k;ky; vkxs dh dk;Zokgh lqfufpr djsaxhA 7- vknsk [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA