JUDGMENT 1. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant special appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated February 12, 1998 of the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition of the appellant who sought entercement of the order dated February 15, 1983 of the State Appellate Service Tribunal. 3. Instead of issuing directions for implementation of the order, learned Single Judge upset the order dated February 15, 1983 itself. In our considered opinion the judgment of learned Single Judge is perverse. The reasons are : (i) The order dated February 15, 1983 of the Service Tribunal attained finality and it was never assailed by the State. (ii) The judgment of Tribunal was not under challenge and it could not have been interfered with. 4. We, therefore, have no option but to set aside the order of learned Single Judge. 5. Resultantly, we allow the appeal and set aside the impugned judgment of learned Single Judge. We direct State of Rajasthan to implement the order dated February 15, 1983 of the State Service Appellate Tribunal. The State shall ensure compliance of this order within 60 days from the date of receipt of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.Appeal allowed. *******