Judgment :- It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a textile machinery manufacturing company for several decades and such machineries are sold in the local market and also exported to foreign countries. The petitioner is a registered dealer under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and regularly filing monthly returns without any default. While so, the respondent had issued two notices on 17. 2007, in TIN.33212020099/2006-07, under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, for Verification of Monthly Returns for the period from January 2007 to March 2007 and another notice, dated 17. 2007, in TIN.33212020099/2007-08 for the period from April 2007 to June 2007 relating to Excess availment of Input Tax Credit. The petitioner had sent a letter, dated 27. 2007, requesting 15 days time to file a reply to the notices, dated 17. 2007. 2. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, without considering the request made by the petitioner, the respondent had passed the impugned proceedings, dated 37. 2007, in TIN.33122020099/2007-08 which is as follows:- "On 17. 2007 through the notices referred above, you have been intimated that you have availed an excess Input Tax Credit of Rs.99,70,989/- and Rs.70,70,655/-in your monthly returns filed for the months of January to June 2007. Through your letter dated 17. 2007, you have asked for 15 more days time to submit the reply. You have not filed any reply till date. It is construed that you have got no reply to file and it is ordered to reverse the above said Input Tax Credit claim by you. A penalty under Sec. 27(4) of 150% for the wrong claim of Input Tax Credit is also levied." 3. Therefore, it is submitted that the respondent had passed the impugned order, dated 37. 2007, without giving sufficient opportunity to the petitioner. 4. Mr. R. Mahadevan, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of the respondent has not refuted the claims made on behalf of the petitioner. 5. In such circumstances, the impugned order of the respondent, dated 37. 2007, made in TIN.33122020099/2007-08, is set aside. The petitioner is permitted to submit a reply to both the notices of the respondent, dated 17. 2007, within a period of 15 days from today. 5. In such circumstances, the impugned order of the respondent, dated 37. 2007, made in TIN.33122020099/2007-08, is set aside. The petitioner is permitted to submit a reply to both the notices of the respondent, dated 17. 2007, within a period of 15 days from today. On such submission of the reply by the petitioner, the respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks thereafter. 6. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P. is closed.