Judgment 1. Heard. 2. This application under sec. 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the order dated 12.9.2006 and 16.10.206 passed by C.J.M., Katihar in Dandkhora P.S. Case No. 30 of 2006 registered under sections 420 and 409 I.P.C. thereby and thereunder the court below on prayer of the I.O. has issued warrant of arrest and after its execution and proclamation also issued order of attachment under section 83 of the Cr.P.C. against the petitioner. 3. It appears from the record that on the basis of the fardbeyan dated 19.6.2006, the police registered case against the petitioner under sections 420 and 409 I.P.C. and thereafter, proceeded to investigate the case which is cognizable offence. In course of investigation, the police prayed for issue of warrant of arrest against the petitioner. The same was allowed by the court vide order dated 12.9.2006. The police submitted its execution report before the court and prayed for issue of proclamation. The same was issued by the court vide order dated 21.9.2006. Thereafter, on 16.10.2006, on the request of the I.O. attachment order against the petitioner was issued by the court. 4. Power and procedure of investigation in cognizable cases have been incorporated in Sections 156 and 157 of the Cr.P.C. It is well known recognized under law that investigation includes arrest of offender or suspects and if necessary the police may obtain W/A under Section 73 of he Cr.P.C. for arrest of the offender. In the event the offender is found absconding, the police may proceed under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. for proclamation and attachment of the property of absconder. 5. On perusal of the photo copy of the ordersheet, it is quite clear that there is no illegality or non-compliance of any provision in issue of warrant of arrest or attachment. The court below has issued warrant of arrest as well as attachment in accordance with law. i do not find any illegality or impropriety in the impugned order. Accordingly, this application stands rejected.