Judgment :- Administrative Tribunal and the same has been transferred to this Court and renumbered as W.P.No.27693 of 2006. 2. With the consent of the learned counsels appearing on either side, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. Though the petitioner has challenged the impugned order passed by the second respondent, on 211. 1993, it is brought to the notice of this Court that an appeal had been preferred by the petitioner before the first respondent, on 21. 1994, and it is still pending on the file of the first respondent. 4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has further submitted that it would suffice, if the first respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioners appeal, dated 21. 1994, within a specified period. 5. Considering the limited prayer sought for by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, without going into the merits of the case, the first respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioners appeal, dated 21. 1994, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving sufficient opportunity to the parties concerned, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the appeal, dated 21. 1994, to the first respondent along with a copy of this order. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.