Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2007 DIGILAW 3010 (MAD)

S. Mahalingam v. A. Sakila Begum & Others

2007-09-14

M.JAICHANDREN

body2007
Judgment :- The learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the second and third respondents. 2. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing on behalf of the second and third respondents, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. Though the prayer is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the second respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 14. 2007, within a specified period. 4. Considering the limited prayer sought for by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, without going into the merits of the case, the second respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 14. 2007, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving sufficient opportunity to the petitioner as well as to the first respondent, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected W.P.M.P.No.1 of 2007 is closed.