Judgment :- K. Raviraja Pandian, J. This appeal has been filed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in I.T.A.No.209/Mds/2005 dated 22. 2005. The relevant assessment year is 2001-02. 2. The substantial question of law formulated for entertainment of the appeal is as follows: “Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the discount loss on chits is to be allowed in its entirety in the year it occurs rather than spread it over the period of the chit?” 3. The assessee is in the business of subscribing to chit funds. For the assessment year 2001-02, the assessee inter alia claimed that the loss arising on account of discount granted should be allowed at the time of accrual and not to be spread over the period of discount. The Assessing Officer followed the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in the assessees own case and revised the working. 4. Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), who dismissed the appeal. The assessee filed a Second Appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which followed the order of this Court reported in 288 ITR 39 (M/S.BILAHARI INVESTMENTS P.LTD. VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX), which is the assessees own case in respect of Assessment years 1991-92, 1992-93 and 1993-94 and decided that the discount loss should only be allowed in the year of accrual. The Revenue filed the present appeal against that order. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the Revenue fairly submits that the issue is covered as against the Revenue in respect of the assessees own case reported in 288 ITR 39 (M/S.BILAHARI INVESTMENTS P.LTD. VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX), wherein, this Court, after taking into consideration Sections 5 and 145 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, held that the income received or deemed to be received or accruing or arising during the previous year shall form part of the total income of the assessee and such income shall be computed in accordance with the accounting system which the assessee regularly followed. Therefore, when the assessee followed the mercantile system of accounting, as required under the Income Tax Act, and entries were posted in the books of account on the date of transaction, that is, on the date on which rights had accrued or liabilities were incurred irrespective of the date of payment, the income derived during a particular previous year by way of chit dividend had to be reckoned and assessed as income of that year. The dividend income had to be taxed on the basis of its accrual in the year of receipt. 6. In the light of the reasoning given in the assessees own case reported in 288 ITR 39 (M/S.BILAHARI INVESTMENTS P.LTD. VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX), the Tax Case Appeal is dismissed.