Manjitsingh Sethi v. The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Building, Chennai & Another
2007-12-10
M.JAICHANDREN
body2007
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment :- Mr.Bharathidasan, the learned counsel appearing for the Corporation takes notice for the respondents. 2. With the consent of the learned counsels appearing on either side, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. Though the prayer sought for by the petitioner in the present writ petition is for a larger relief, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the petitioner, dated 110. 2000, sent to the respondents, is directed to be disposed of on merits, within a specified period. 4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 5. Considering the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the second respondent is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 110. 2007, on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the parties concerned, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to furnish to the second respondent a copy of the representation, along with a copy of this order. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected MP is closed.