iqjksfgr] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1956 dh /kkjk 230 ds rgr jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh lhdj dSEi >qa>quw ds vknsk fnukad 29-8-2001 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds la{ksi esa rF; bl izdkj gS fd e`rd ghjkjke iq= HkkÅjke ds ,d jktLo okn varxZr /kkjk 88 ,oa 188 jktLFkku fVusalh ,DV ds rgr lgk;d dyDVj >qa>qauw ds le{k isk fd;k ftlesa nkSjkus okn ghjkjke oknh dh e`R;q gks tkus ds dkj.k muds dk;e eqdke fjdkMZ ij ysus dk izkFkZuk i= isk fd;k x;k ftlesa izfroknh dh vksj ls tokc izLrqr fd;k x;k ,oa dk;e eqdke dks fjdkMZ ij ysus dk izkFkZuk i= le;kof/k esa izLrqr ugha djus ds vk/kkj ij okn dks vcsV djus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vius vknsk fnukad 5-12-1985 }kjk okn dks vcsV gqvk ekudj oknhx.k dh nj[okLr [kkfjt dj nh] ftlds fo:) oknhx.k dh vksj ls jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh lhdj ds le{k vihy izLrqr dh xbZ] ftls mUgksaus vihy ds lkFk fMØh dh udy izLrqr ugha gksus ds vk/kkj ij vihy fnukad 26-6-1995 dks [kkfjt dj nh] ftlds fo:) jktLo e.My U;k;ky; esa fuxjkuh izLrqr dh xbZ ,oa mä fuxjkuh dks fnukad 14-8-1997 dks e.My }kjk Lohdkj dj izdj.k iqu% jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh dks izfrizsf"kr dj fu.kZ; djus gsrq Hkstk x;kA e.My ds fu.kZ; ds fo:) ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp u;k;ky; esa fjV ;kfpdk nk;j dh xbZA ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; us mä fjV ;kfpdk fnukad 1-5-2001 dks [kkfjt djrs gq, jktLo e.My ds fu.kZ; fnukad 5-8-1997 dks cgky j[kk ftlds vuqlkj izdj.k iqu% lquokbZ gsrq jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh lhdj ds le{k isk gqvk vkSj jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh lhdj us vius vknsk fnukad 29-8-2001 }kjk oknhx.k ds dk;e eqdkeku dh vksj ls isk dh xbZ vihy dks Lohdkj djlgk;d dyDVj >qa>quw dk vknsk fnukad 5-12-85 dks fujLr dj oknh ds dk;e eqdke dks fjdkMZ ij ysrs gq, okn dk fu.kZ; xq.kkoxq.k ij djus dk vknsk fn;kA jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh ds mä vknsk fnukad 29-8-2001 ds fo:) ;g fuxjkuh izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 3- izkFkhZ@izfroknh ds vfHkHkk"kd dk rdZ gS fd ewy oknh ghjkjke dh e`R;q fnukad 15-3-1984 dks gks xbZ Fkh vkSj oknh ds dk;e eqdke }kjk dk;e eqdke dks fjdkMZ ij ysus dk izkFkZuk i= le;kof/k ds Hkhrj isk ugha fd;k x;kA bl vk/kkj ij fopkj.k U;k;ky; us okn dks vcsV fd;k gS ysfdu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us vius vknsk esa ;g ekurs gq, Hkh fd nksuksa i{kdkjksa ds }kjk iq[rk lk{; izLrqr ugha fd, gSA ghjkjke dh e`R;q fnukad 15-3-1984 ds ctk; fnukad 17-3-1984 ekurs gq, dk;e eqdke fjdkMZ ij ysus ds izkFkZuk i= dks le;kof/k esa ekudj dk;e eqdke dks fjdkMZ ij ysus dk tks vknsk fn;k gS] og drbZ vuqfpr o voS/kkfud gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd dk;e eqdke dh nj[okLr esa e`rd oknh ds iq= dk uke <wykjke crk;k x;k gS tcfd mlds yM+ds dk uke nwykjke gSA bl laca/k esa vHkh jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh us dksbZ fopkj ugha fd;k gSA 4- vizkFkhZ@e`rd oknh ghjkjke ds dk;e eqdke dh vksj ls muds vfHkHkk"kd us rdZ izLrqr fd;k gS fd oknh ghjkjke dh e`R;q okn ds yfEcr jgrs fnukad 17-3-1984 dks gqbZ] ftl ij mlds dk;e eqdke fjdkMZ ij ysus dk izkFkZuk i= le;kof/k esa fnukad 14-6-1984 dks isk dj fn;k x;k rFkk bl laca/k esa ekSf[kd lk{; Hkh izLrqr fd;s x;s o nLrkosth lk{; ds :i esa ,Xth-ih@1 ds :i esa ljnkjkjke dh cgh izekf.kr djokbZ ftlls Hkh oknh ghjkjke dh e`R;q fnukad 17-3-1984 gksuk izekf.kr gqvk gSA blds vykok Hkh mudk rdZ gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; us dsoy nks fnu dh nsjh dks vk/kkj cukdj okn dks xq.kkoxq.k ij fu.kZ; u djrs gq, vcsV djus dk tks vknsk fn;k gS mls fujLr djus dk jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh dk vknsk fof/k ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqdwy ,oa ekuuh; jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; o loksZPp U;k;ky; ds fu.kZ;ksa esa izfrikfnr fl)kUrksa ds vuq:i vknsk gSA 5- geus nksuksa fo}ku i{kdkjku~ ds vfHkHkk"kd ds rdZ lqusaA mu ij euu fd;k rFkk izdj.k ls lacaf/kr miyC/k fjdkMZ dk Hkh xgurk ls voyksdu fd;kA 6- izLrqr izdj.k esa lu~ 1984 esa izLrqr fd;s x;s okn esa oknh ds nsgkUr ds ckn mlds dk;e eqdke dks fjdkMZ ij ysus ds izkFkZuk i= ij ikfjr fd;s x;s vknsk dh pqukSrh nj pqukSrh nsusds dkj.k lu~ 2007 rd mlh vknsk ij ;g izdj.k vVdk gqvk gS tks u dsoy fparuh; gS cfYd i{kdkjksa ds chp okn ds fuiVkjsa esa gks jgh gS nsjh dks Hkh ifjyf{kr dj jgk gSA ;g fookfnr ugha gS fd ;fn orZeku izkFkhZ }kjk dh xbZ vkifÙk dks Lohdkj dj Hkh fy;k tk; rc Hkh dk;e eqdke dks fjdkMz ij ysus dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djus esa nks fnu dh nsjh ekuh tk,xh D;ksafd ;fn fnukad 15-3-1984 dks ghjkjke dh e`R;q ekuh tkrh gS rks dk;e eqdke dks fjdkMZ ij ysus ds izkFkZuk i= ds fnu vFkkZr~ fnukad 14-6-1984 dks dqy 92 fnu gks tkrs gS tc fd ;fn fnukad 17-3-1984 dks ghjkjke dh e`R;q dh fnukad ekuh tkrh gS rks dk;e eqdke dks fjdkMZ ij ysus dk izkFkZuk i= le;kof/k esa ekuk tkrk gSA lhihlh ds izko/kku vkWMZj 22 :y 3 o vkWMZj 22 :y 9 esa ;g izkof/kr fd;k x;k gS fd dk;e eqdke dks fjdkMZ ij ysus ds laca/k esa izkFkZuk i= 90 fnu ds vanj izLrqr fd;k tkuk pkfg, vkSj 90 fnu dk le; lekIr gksus ij okn@vihy Lor% gh vcsV gks tkrh gS rFkk blds ipkr~ vknsk 22 fu;e 9 lhihlh ds rgr 60 fnol esas mä vcsVesaV dks lsV vlkbZM djokus dk izkFkZuk i= e; larks"ktud dkj.k ds izLrqr fd;k tk ldrk gSA ekuuh; jkLLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ,oa loksZPp U;k;ky; rFkk e.My ds bl laca/k esa ikfjr fofup;ksa esa lhihlh ds bu izko/kkuksa dks ykxw djrs le; dsoy ek= rduhfd vk/kkj ij izdj.k dks fuf.kZr u dj tgka rd laHko gks lds fdlh okn vFkok vihy dks xq.kkoxq.k ij fuf.kZr djus ij tksu fn;k x;k gSA 7- lhihlh esa dk;e eqdke dks jsdkMZ ij ysus rFkk ,slk ugha djus ij vcsV gq, ekeys dks ^lsV vlkbZM* djus ds ckcr~ fuEu izko/kku fn;s gq, gS%& Order 22 Rule 3 CPC.– Procedure in case of death of one several plaintiffs or of sole plaintiff– "(1) Where one of two or more plaintiff dies and the right to sue does not survive to the plaintiff of plaintiffs alone, or a sole plaintiff or sole surviving plaintiff dies and the right to sue survives, the Court, on an application made in that behalf, shall cause the legal representative of the deceased plaintiff to be made a party and shall proceed with the suit. (2) Where within the time limited by law no application is made under sub-rule (1), the suit shall abate so far as the deceased plaintiff is concerned, and, on the application of the defendant, the Court may award to him the costs which he may have incurred in defending the suit, to be recovered from the estate of the deceased plaintiff." Order 22 Rule 9 CPC.– "Effect of abatement or dismissal.—(1) Where a suit abates or is dismissed under this Order, no fresh suit shall be brought on the same cause of action. (2) The plaintiff of the person claiming to be the legal representative of a deceased plaintiff or the assignee or the receiver in the case of an insolvent plaintiff may apply for an order to set aside the abatement or dismissal; and if it is proved that he was prevented by any sufficient cause from continuing the suit, the Court shall set aside the abatement or dismissal upon such terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks fit. (3) The provisions of Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1877 (15 of 1877), shall apply to applications under sub-rule (2). [Explanation.—Nothing in this rule shall be construed as barring, in any later suit, a defence based on the facts which constituted the cause of action in the suit which had abated or had been dismissed under Order.] 8- bl laca/k esa U;k; dk ;g izfrikfnr fl)kUr gS fd i{kdkjksa fl)kUr gS fd i{kdkjksa dks lkjHkwr fu.kZ; feyuk pkfg, ftlds laca/k esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk tks fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS] og bl izdkj gS%& "1985(3) LCD page 87 Smt. Ashrafi and others vs. Jaipal Singh and others esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k gS fd%& "We may point out that having regard to the social and economic conditions prevalent in the country and particularly in the rural areas and the large scale poverty and illiteracy, which is rampant is the country, as a result of which most people do not know what are their rights and obligations, the applications for condonation of delay in bringing legal representatives on record, should be considered liberally by the Courts. No technical view should be taken which would impede the course of justice. No technical view should be taken which would impede the course of justice. We hope and trust that the High Court will consider the application for setting aside the abatement and condoning the delay in bringing the legal representatives of respondent No.1 on record, from this point of view and dispose it of according to law". Mithai Lal Dalsangar Singh & Ors. Vs. Annabai Devram Kini & Ors. IV (2003) CLT 89 (SC) = (2003) 10 SCC Page 691) esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us vfHkfu/kkfjr fd;k gS fd %& "(i) Setting aside abatement of suit as regards deceased Plaintiff : Condonation of delay — Sufficient cause : Prayer allowed and LRs of deceased plaintiff came on record : Constitution of suit rendered good : Abatement of suit would be deemed to have been set aside in its entirely even though no specific prayer made." ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; us vkj-ch-ts- ¼11½ 2004 ist 623 ij ^^ds :njIik cuke fkoIik** esa tks fl)kUr izfrikfnr fd;k gS] og bl izdkj gS%& Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order 22 Rule 3 — When petitioners father died during the pendency of appeal — Petitioners was not aware of pendency of appeal — He came to know when he received a communication from advocate engaged by his father — Order rejection application on ground that no prayer for setting aside abatement of appeal was made and there was no prayer for condonation of delay — Liable to be set aside such technical objections should not come in way of doing justice — The case of the appellant before the District Judge was that he was not aware of the pendency of the appeal filed by his father against the order passed by Tehsildar. The father of the appellant died in June, 1994 and the appellant came to, know about the pendency of appeal somewhere in September 1994 when he received a communication from the advocate engaged by his father. Immediately, he contacted the said advocate, informed him regarding the death of his father and made an application. A hyper technical view ought not to have been taken by the District Court in rejecting the application inter alia observing that no prayer for setting aside abatement of appeal was made and there was also no prayer for condonation of delay. Immediately, he contacted the said advocate, informed him regarding the death of his father and made an application. A hyper technical view ought not to have been taken by the District Court in rejecting the application inter alia observing that no prayer for setting aside abatement of appeal was made and there was also no prayer for condonation of delay. In any case, when separate applications were made they ought to have been allowed — Such technical objections should not come in doing full complete justice between the parties. Appeal allowed." 9- mijksä fofup;ksa ,oa lhihlh ds vknsk 22 fu;e 3 o vknsk ds izko/kkuksa dks /;ku esa j[kdj bl izdj.k esa ikfjr vknskksa dh foospuk djus ij ;g Li"V gksrk gS fd fopkj.k U;k;ky; us vius vknsk fnukad 5-12-1985 esa oknh ghjkjke dh e`R;q ds ipkr~ mlds dk;e eqdke dks fjdkMZ ij ysus gsrq izLrqr fd;s x;s izkFkZuk i= ij fnukad 5-12-1985 dks vknsk nsrs gq, vR;Ur gh ^^gkbZij VSDuhdy** n`f"Vdks.k viukrs gq, nks fnu dh nsjh dks v{kE; ekudj nkok vcsV fd;k gS tcfd jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh }kjk vius vknsk esa Li"V :i ls ;g vafdr fd;k x;k gS fd oknh }kjk —f"k Hkwfe ds laca/k esa izLrqr okn esa mlds gd o vf/kdkjksa dk fu.kZ; xq.kkoxq.k ij fd;k tkuk mfpr gS o ,slk ugha gksus ls vkSj okn ds vcsV dj nsus ls oknh ds dk;e eqdke dks viw.khZ; {kfr gksxhA 10- mijksä foospu ds vk/kkj ij ;g fuxjkuh fujLr dh tkrh gS rFkk jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh lhdj dSEi >qa>quw dk vknsk fnukad 29-8-2001 ;Fkkor~ j[kk tkrk gS rFkk fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks funsZk fn;s tkrs gS fd lu~ 1984 ls yfEcr bl okn dk fu.kZ; vko;d :i ls bl vknsk ds ikfjr gksus ds N% ekg ds Hkhrj djsaA fu.kZ; [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA