Research › Search › Judgment

Orissa High Court · body

2007 DIGILAW 432 (ORI)

Gulei @ Golap Samal v. Shaikh Saffiqueuddin

2007-06-18

A.S.NAIDU

body2007
JUDGMENT A. S. NAIDU, J. : A petition filed under Order 1, Rule 10 C.P.C by the plaintiff in T.S. No.31/1997 pending in the Court of 1st Addl. Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Cuttack to implead the Commissioner of Endowment as a party)’ has been rejected by order dtd.24.3.2004. A subsequent petition with the very same prayer has again been rejected by the Court below by order dtd.13.8.2004. Being aggrieved the plaintiff has filed these writ applications. 2. Admittedly, the properties involved in the suit origi¬nally belonged to the Institution of Sri Sri Laxminarayan Jew Bije, Ramgarh, Mansing Patna commonly known as Mastara Math. The lands stand recorded in the name of the Executive Officer of Mastara Math Trust Board. During pendency of the suit which is one for declaring that the sale deeds dtd.20.11.1964 and 10.3.1983 are illegal and void and for other ancillary relief, a petition was filed under Order 1, Rule 10 C.P.C. by the plaintiff to implead the Commissioner. The said petition was rejected by an order dtd.24.3.2004. Subsequently another petition was also filed under Order 1, Rule 10 C.P.C. seeking similar relief by the plaintiff which was rejected by order dtd.13.8.2004. Being ag¬grieved the petitioner has approached this Court. 3. Admittedly the record of rights reveals that the lands stood recorded in the name of Sri Sri Laxminarayan Jew Bije, Ramgarh, Mansingh Patna, Mastara Math Trust Board represented by Executive Officer. The said institution is not a party. Even otherwise in consonance with Section 69 of the Orissa Hindu Religious and Endowments Act whenever the trustee of any reli¬gious institution is sued in any civil or Revenue Court in re¬spect of any property belonging to or given or endowed for the purpose of any religious institution, notice of such suit shall be given by the Court concerned to the Commissioner at least a month before commencement of the hearing. The impugned order reveals that the Court below has not kept in mind the aforesaid provisions. As the lands in dispute originality belonged to a religious institution, according to this Court a notice should be issued to the Commissioner of Endowments so as to avoid any collusion among the parties inter se. The Court below shall also frame an issue as to whether the suit is maintainable in the absence of the trust board of Mastara Math. With the aforesaid observations, these Writ Petitions are disposed of. The Court below shall also frame an issue as to whether the suit is maintainable in the absence of the trust board of Mastara Math. With the aforesaid observations, these Writ Petitions are disposed of. Petitions disposed of.