JUDGMENT S.S. Saron, J. (Oral):- This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for seeking directions to the respondents to complete investigation in F.I.R. No.112 dated 21.4.2005 registered at Police Station Shahbad, District Kurukshetra for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 463, 464, 467, 468, 471, 474, 120-B and 34 IPC. 2. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the record, in my view, the petitioner has an alternative remedy of approaching Illaqa Magistrate. In State of Haryana v. Ch. Bhajan Lal, A.I.R. 1992 S.C. 604 it was though held that the field of the investigation is exclusively reserved for the police officers whose powers in that field are unfettered. This, however, is subject to the rider that the power to investigate in respect of cognizable offences is legitimately exercised in strict compliance with the provisions falling under Chaper XII of the Cr.P.C. It was observed that a Magistrate is kept in the picture at all stages of the police investigation but he is not authorized to interfere with the actual investigation or to direct the police how that investigation is to be conducted. But if a police officer transgresses the circumscribed limits and improperly and illegally exercises his investigatory powers in breach of any statutory provision causing serious prejudice to the personal liberty and also property of a citizen, then the Court on being approached by the person aggrieved for the redressal of any grievance has to consider the nature and extent of the breach and pass appropriate orders as may be called for without leaving the citizens to the mercy of police echelons since human dignity is a dear value of our Constitution. In the circumstances, the petitioner evidently has an alternate efficacious remedy. Therefore, as already noticed it would be appropriate if he approaches the Illaqa Magistrate in the first instance. 3. In view of the above the present petition is disposed of being premature. —————————————