JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor. 2. This bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. arises out of Criminal Case No. 15/1996 State v. Mukhtiyar Singh and others pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Deeg for offence under Section 307 I.P.C. 3. Submission of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant was on bail in the aforesaid case and he has attended dates of hearing. The applicant had gone to his relatives. Moreover, the record of the criminal case was summoned by the revisional Court. Hence, the applicant could not appear before the trial Court on 14.11.1995 on which date his bail bonds were forfeited and warrant of arrest was issued against him. In execution of warrant, the applicant has been arrested on 29.3.2007 and since then he is in jail. 4. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor while opposing the bail application submitted that the applicant was negligent in attending Court and therefore, he should not be granted bail. 5. Without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case and taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case for the purpose of bail, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant. 6. It is, therefore, ordered that applicant Om Pal son of Vijay Singh shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court as and when called upon to do so during pendency of the trial against hint in Criminal Case No. 15/1996 State v. Mukhtiyar Singh and others pending in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate, Deeg for offence under Section 307 I.P.C.Bail application allowed. *******