ORDER : B.N. Agrawal, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Leave granted. 2. The Tahsildar refused to grant certificate to the appellants to the effect that they belonged to a Scheduled Caste, which necessitated filing of writ petition before the High Court of Kerala giving rise to OP No. 5732 of 1985. 3. By judgment dated 2-8-1985, the learned Single Judge recorded a clear-cut finding that the appellants belonged to the Thandan community and consequently were members of the Scheduled Caste. Accordingly, the Tahsildar was directed to issue required certificate in favour of the appellants. The said order attained finality as the same was not assailed either before the High Court in appeal or this Court under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, inasmuch as no review petition was filed. But in violation of the aforesaid order of the High Court, the Tahsildar again refused to grant certificate to the appellants who had no option but to take a second round by filing a fresh writ petition giving rise to OP No. 6265 of 1997 whereby the order passed by the Tahsildar refusing to grant certificate was quashed and he was directed to issue a certificate in favour of the appellants. 4. Curiously enough, this time, for the reasons best known to the State, a writ appeal was filed against the said order which, it appears, might have been filed at the instance of the delinquent Tahsildar, who was also one of the appellants in appeal and unfortunately the Division Bench of the High Court instead of dismissing the appeal by awarding heavy costs, has remitted the matter to the Tahsildar for fresh enquiry in the matter without at all applying its mind and adverting to the fact that the order dated 2-8-1985 passed in the earlier writ petition attained finality, the same having not been challenged before any higher court. The present appeal has been filed by way of special leave. 5. In our view, the state of affairs in the State of Kerala, at the relevant time, was shocking. The present appeal has been filed by way of special leave. 5. In our view, the state of affairs in the State of Kerala, at the relevant time, was shocking. When the High Court after due consideration recorded a finding that the appellants belonged to the Thandan community which was a Scheduled Caste and directed the Tahsildar to grant certificate in their favour, we really fail to understand how the officer of the State could dare to refuse to act in the teeth of the order of the High Court which attained finality. As a matter of fact, it was a clear-cut case of contempt in which the Tahsildar could have been hauled up, but we do not propose to adopt that procedure as the order was passed in the year 1985, a period of twenty-three years therefrom has expired and the officer might have retired from service or even from this world. There cannot be a better case than this for awarding heavy costs against the State Government, which must be paid to the appellants within the time fixed by this Court. 6. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs, the impugned order passed by the Division Bench is set aside, the same passed by the learned Single Judge restored and the present Tahsildar is hereby commanded to grant the required certificate within one month from today. Hearing fee is assessed at rupees fifty thousand, which shall be paid by the District Magistrate concerned to the appellants by demand drafts drawn in their favour drawn upon a local bank within the same time. All concerned would see that the directions aforementioned are carried out within the time schedule so that this Court may not be compelled to take any harsh action against them. 7. This order shall be communicated by the learned counsel appearing for the State to the Chief Secretary with a copy to the District Magistrate concerned. Appeal allowed with costs.