Research › Search › Judgment

Jharkhand High Court · body

2008 DIGILAW 126 (JHR)

Satya Narayan Singh v. Randli University, Ranchi

2008-02-06

AMARESHWAR SAHAY

body2008
Order Heard the counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner had moved this Court earlier in WPS No. 2346/2001 making a grievance that though he retired from the service on 1.2.1994 but he was neither allowed the benefits of time bound promotion, nor his pension was fixed nor the retiral benefits were given on revised scale of pay. 3. The said writ petition was disposed of by order dated 12.6.2001 as contained in Annexure-8 to the writ petition, giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Vice-Chancellor, Ranchi University for such relief by filing a representation and the respondents were directed to determine the question relating grant of selection grade scale and retiral benefits in the revised scale within a period of three months. It was further directed that if any amount was found payable, the same should be paid thereof. 4. Pursuant to the said order, the petitioner made a detailed representation before the Vice-Chancellor, Ranchi University on 27.6.2001 as contained in Annexure-9 to the writ petition. The representation of the petitioner was disposed of by order dated 11.6.2002 under the signature of the Registrar, Ranchi University, Ranchi as contained in Annexure-10 to the writ petition. 5. The petitioner by challenging the said order dated 11.6.2002, contained in Annexure-10 has submitted that the impugned order is not at all in conformity with the order and direction passed by this Court in the earlier writ petition and the claim of the petitioner for fixation of pension in the revised pay scale as well as grant of selection grade scale etc. had not be determined as directed by this Court. 6. Mr. Mehta learned counsel appearing for the respondents Ranchi University very fairly submitted that the impugned order, as contained in Annexure-10, is not a speaking order and from perusal of which it does not appear that the claim of the petitioner has been determined as directed by this Court. 7. In this view of the matter, this writ petition is allowed at this stage by setting aside the order elated 11.6.2002, contained in Annexure-10, issued under the signature of the Registrar. 7. In this view of the matter, this writ petition is allowed at this stage by setting aside the order elated 11.6.2002, contained in Annexure-10, issued under the signature of the Registrar. Ranchi University, Ranchi and the matter is remitted back to the respondents to determine the claim of the petitioner raised in his representation by a speaking order strictly following the direction of this Court passed in the earlier writ petition, i.e. WPS No. 2346/2001 within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. It goes without saying that after determination of the claim of the petitioner, if any amount is found payable, the same shall be paid to the petitioner without any further delay.