Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2008 DIGILAW 1343 (SC)

Nirma Credit and Capital Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

2008-08-08

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, S.H.KAPADIA

body2008
ORDER : S.H. Kapadia, J. Leave granted. 2. The important question which arose before the High Court in the assessees appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was whether the Tribunal was right in holding that depreciation of plant and machinery was not allowable on the ground that the assessee had not manufactured the goods during the previous year. 3. It appears that the operation of the assessees business stood suspended during the previous year. The assessee claims that despite such suspension of operation the assessee was still entitled to claim depreciation on the ground of passive user. This aspect has not been gone into by the High Court on dismissing the assessees appeal under Section 260-A. In fact no reason whatsoever has been recorded by the High Court on this point. 4. In the circumstances, we set aside the impugned judgment and remit the matter to the High Court for fresh decision in accordance with law. We request the High Court, if possible, to dispose of the matter, as early as possible, within six months. 5. The appeals are disposed of with no order as to costs.