Annai Sandhya Nagar Kudiyirupor v. The Commissioner
2008-05-14
G.RAJASURIA
body2008
DigiLaw.ai
Judgment :- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the order, which is going to be passed here-under, no notice to the other side is required. At this stage itself, I would like to dispose of the writ petition. 2. A few facts absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this petition, would run thus: O.S.No.7876 of 1999 was filed by the petitioner herein, seeking declaration and injunction, but that was dismissed on merits by the Civil Court concerned on 33. 2008. The petitioner is intending to prefer an appeal before the Principal Civil Court, Chennai. In the meanwhile, the defendant, namely the respondent herein, is trying to evict the persons without even resorting to the procedures relating to eviction as per law. Hence, in these circumstances, the writ will lie. Taking into account the vacation as well as the fact that no copy of the Civil Courts judgment and decree has been furnished to the petitioner as on today, I would like to issue the following direction: "The respondent shall not take any steps to interfere with the possession or evict the petitioner, pending filing of the appeal and trying to get necessary orders from the appellate court. As such, this direction shall be effective for two months from this day." 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected MP is closed.