Research › Search › Judgment
Rajasthan High Court · body
2008 DIGILAW 155 (RAJ)
Nand Kishore v. Devi Narayan
2008-01-18
KAMAL NAYAN SHRIMAL
body2008
Jheky] lnL;-&;g fuxjkuh jktLFkku dkrdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼ftls rRipkr~ la{ksi esa ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dgk tkosxk½ dh /kkjk 230 lifBr /kkjk 221 ds vUrxZr Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] Vksad ds fu.kZ; fnukad 7-6-2007 ds fo:) izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2- izdj.k ds rF; la{ksi esa bl izdkj gS fd oknh vkseizdkk] iwj.key o uUnfdkksj us ,d jktLo okn bLrdjkjgd ,oa LFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk dk vkjkth la- 3536 jdck 9 ch?kk 18 fcLok o [kljk ua- 3542 jdck 3 ch?kk okds dLck fuokbZ esa fLFkfr] ds lEcU/k esa izLrqr fd;kA okn ds lkFk oknhx.k us ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 212 dk izkFkZuk i= okLrs vLFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk isk dj fuosnu fd izfroknhx.k dks tfj, vLFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk rkQSlyk okn ikcan fd;k tk, fd izfroknhx.k mijksä of.kZr vkjkth dks fdlh vU; nhxj O;fä dks gLrkUrj.k ugha djsa] u gh mä vkjft;kr esa fdlh izdkj dk etkger] enk[yr ugha djsa rFkk rglhynkj fuokbZ dks ikcan fd;k tk, fd mä vkjft;kr ds lEcU/k esa isk gksus okys foØ; i=] nku i=] olh;r ,oa eq[r;kjukesa [kkl o vke dk iath;u ugha djsaA lEeu rkehy ds ipkr~ mä izkFkZuk i= dk tokc izfroknh lhrkjke] nsohukjk;.k] iou] jktk] feBkyky] y{ehukjk;.k o guqeku us isk dj fuosnu fd;k fd mijksä of.kZr vkjkth esa izfroknhx.k dk 2@3 gd o fgLlk gS] ftlesa oknhx.k dks ikcan fd;k tk, fd os fdlh izdkj n[yvUnkth] ck/kk] etgker] O;o/kku] vM+pu ,oa enk[yr cstk Lo;a ugha djsa ,oa tfj, ,ts.V] ukSdj] ikfjokfjd O;fä ;k vU; fdlh Hkh O;fä ls ugha djok, rFkk ikcUn jgsA mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] fuokbZ us i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ oknhx.k dk vLFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk dk izkFkZuk i= muds vknsk fnukad 10-5-2007 }kjk fujLr dj fn;ka mä vknsk ls O;fFkr gksdj izkFkhZx.k@oknhx.k us vihy jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] Vksad ds le{k izLrqr dhA vihy ds lkFk izkFkhZx.k us ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 212 dk izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;kA i{kdkjksa dks lquus ds ipkr~ Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] Vksad us muds vknsk fnukad 7-6-2007 }kjk izkFkhZx.k dk izkFkZuk i= ckcr~ vLFkkbZ fu"ks/kkKk fujLr dj fn;kA mä vknsk ls O;fFkr gksdj izkFkhZx.k us izuxr fuxjkuh jktLo e.My jktLFkku] vtesj esa izLrqr dh gSA 3- i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k dks lquk x;kA 4- vizkFkhZ la- 1 ls 8 ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k us izkjfEHkd vkifÙk mBkrs gq, dgk fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr fuxjkuh iks"k.kh; ugha gS] vr% mls fujLr fd;k tkosA Hkw izcU/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jktLo vihy izkf/kdkjh] Vksad dk vknsk fnukad 7-6-2007 dsl fMlkbZMsM esa ugha vkrkA vius mijksä dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus vkj-vkj-Mh- 1998 ist 249] vkj-vkj-Mh- 1989 ist 155] vkj-vkj-Mh- 2001 ist 385] 2006¼1½ vkj-vkj-Vh- ist 637] 1990¼1½ vkj-,y-vkj- ist 27 U;kf;d n`"VkUr dk lgkjk fy;kA 5- izkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koäk us tokc nsrs gq, dgk fd izkjfEHkd vkifÙk ds fcUnq dks vizkFkhZx.k }kjk fuxjkuh dks Jo.kkFkZ xzg.k djus ds Lrj ij Hkh mBk;k x;k Fkk vkSj muds vk{ksi dks lquus ds ipkr~ jktLo e.My us fuxjkuh dks iks"k.kh; ekuk gS] bl dkj.k vizkFkhZx.k mlh fcUnq dks iqu% ugha mBk ldrsA izkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koäk dh ;g nyhy gs fd ;fn fuxjkuh ,d ckj Jo.kkFkZ xzg.k dj yh xbZ rks mldk fuLrkj.k xq.kkxq.k ij gh fd;k tkuk pkfg,A vius mijksä dFku ds leFkZu esa mUgksaus 1994 vkj-ch-ts- ist 24] vkj-vkj-Mh- 2004 ist 494] vkj-vkj-Mh- 2002 ist 744 U;kf;d n`"VkUrksa dk lgkjk fy;kA izkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koäk us fodYi esa ;g Hkh dgk fd ;fn jktLo e.My bl urhtsa ij igqaprk gS fd izkFkhZx.k }kjk izLrqr fuxjkuh iks"k.kh; ugha gS rks jktLo e.My ^vf/kfu;e 1955* dh /kkjk 221 dh kfä;ksa dks bLrseky djrs gq, v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa }kjk ikfjr fof/k fo:) vknskksa dks fujLr djsaA 6- eSus i{kdkjksa ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k dh nyhyksa ij euu fd;kA 7- ;g fufoZokn gS fd mi[k.M vf/kdkjh] fuokbZ }kjk ikfjr vknsk fnukad 10-5-2007 ds fo:) izkFkhZ us jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh] Vksad ds le{k vihy 24@2007] muoku iwj.key o vU; cuke lhrkjke o vU; izLrqr dh tks yfEcr gSA izkFkhZx.k dk ;g vk{ksi ugha gS fd vknsk fnukad 7-6-2007 diViwoZd ikfjr fd;k x;k gSA cynso nkl cuke fQYeLrku fMLVªhC;wVlZ ,-vkbZ-vkj- 1970 ,l-lh- 406 ds iSjk 10 esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us ;g dgk gS fd % "The learned Munsif rejected the application of the petitioner filed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC and that order being appealable, the petitioner filed an appeal under Order 41 CPC.
If any stay is sought from the Appellate Court, then application would be under Order 41 Rule 5 CPC, so the plaintiff-petitioner might have moved an application before the learned District Judge under Order 39, Rule 1 & 2 CPC, but actually that was under Order 41, Rule 5 CPC, and the learned District Judge did not agree to grant interim stay. As is clear from the impugned order, the miscellaneous appeal is pending, and the date fixed therein was 27th may, 1988. Now, as stated by the learned counsel for the respondents the next date is 12th Aug., 1988. It means the appeal is pending, and the order of the learned District Judge, is not a final order. This order being an interlocutory order, and the main appeal being pending, no revision lies against such an order, before this Court. The plaintiff-petitioner should approach the learned District Judge, for hearing his appeal at an early date, if he thinks that the matter is so important for him." mi;qZä foospu ds ifjizs{; esa esjh lqfopkfjr jk; esa fuxjkuh iks"k.kh; ugh gksus ds dkj.k fujLr ;ksX; gS vkSj [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA v/kh{k.k dh kfä ds iz;ksx dk vkJ; dsoy xaHkhj =qfV ds ekeyksa esa lhfer :i ls fd;k tk ldrk gSA izuxr vknsk voS/krk ls xzLr ugha gS] u gh diV ls izkIr fd;k x;k gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky;ksa us izuxr vknsk fof/k ds mica/kksa dks /;ku esa j[kdj ikfjr fd;k gSA eSa izkFkhZx.k ds fo}ku vf/koäkx.k dh bl nyhy ls lger ugha gwW fd izuxr izdj.k esa /kkjk 221 ^vf/kfu;e 1955* ds vf/kdkjksa dk iz;ksx fd;k tk,A Hkw izca/k vf/kdkjh ,oa insu jkto vihy izkf/kdkjh] Vksad dks funsZk fn, tkrs gS fd os muds ;gka yfEcr vihy la[;k 24@2007 dks ;FkklEHko vkt fnukad ls rhu ekg esa fuLrkfjr djsaA 10- vknsk [kqys U;k;ky; esa lquk;k x;kA[ 2008 DIGILAW 155 (RAJ) · digilaw.ai ]