JUDGMENT 1. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s), as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the only act alleged by the applicant Anop Lal is that he witnessed the document on 30.07.05. The document was executed by Shera Ram so it cannot be said that wrong person was identified. Other co-accused person has been given benefit of bail.Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application. 3. Having considered the entire facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner(s) under Section 438, Cr. P C. 4. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 438, Cr.P.C., is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of accused petitioner Anop Lal S/o Fakira Ram in FIR No. 161/2008 of the Police Station Anoopgarh he shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned SHO/IO, on the following conditions : (i) That the petitioners shall make himself/herself/themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) That the petitioner(s) shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii) That the petitioner(s) shall not leave India, without previous permission of the Court; & (iv) That this order shall remain in force till the expiry of fifteen days after charge-sheet is filed. Application allowed. *******